We and humanity

[mikkel_the_dane]

Well, all humans are a member of humanity, but from there doesn't follow that you and I are a case of we otherwise for all usages of we.
I mean for morality if you and I have a different understanding of that we are not the same as we have the same understanding of morality.
In fact for a similar case of how to act, we don't necessary act the same, thus we are not a case of we act in the same manner.
That is basic sociology and part of how we are different for different sub-cultures within humanity.

So you and I are in the group of we, unless I am one of them. It is that simple.

 

[kadzbiz]

okay

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

okay

The joke is that if you watch out for that we, both "sides" use it as a social we, but seems to take for granted that it is universal for humanity as such.

 

[viole]

Well, all humans are a member of humanity, but from there doesn't follow that you and I are a case of we otherwise for all usages of we.
I mean for morality if you and I have a different understanding of that we are not the same as we have the same understanding of morality.
In fact for a similar case of how to act, we don't necessary act the same, thus we are not a case of we act in the same manner.
That is basic sociology and part of how we are different for different sub-cultures within humanity.

So you and I are in the group of we, unless I am one of them. It is that simple.

Whatever you say. Or we say.

Ciao

- viole

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Whatever you say. Or we say.

Ciao

- viole

Yeah, you are one of the special ones. You are one of the few, who are totally rational. But don't worry that you are a minority, we will still take care of you.
So you are one of them and I am a part of we as the majority. That is all that matters.

 

[PureX]

We are all very much alike, and yet we are all also very unique. It's a difference created by contextual perspective.

It's not always easy to do, but I think we can be cognizant of both perspectives simultaneously.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

We are all very much alike, and yet we are all also very unique. It's a difference created by contextual perspective.

It's not always easy to do, but I think we can be cognizant of both perspectives simultaneously.

Well, I try, but yes, it is not easy.

 

[JDMS]

Well, all humans are a member of humanity, but from there doesn't follow that you and I are a case of we otherwise for all usages of we.
I mean for morality if you and I have a different understanding of that we are not the same as we have the same understanding of morality.
In fact for a similar case of how to act, we don't necessary act the same, thus we are not a case of we act in the same manner.
That is basic sociology and part of how we are different for different sub-cultures within humanity.

So you and I are in the group of we, unless I am one of them. It is that simple.

I know we are, but what am I?

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I know we are, but what am I?

Something else than me. The rest depends on further context.

 

[kadzbiz]

The joke is that if you watch out for that we, both "sides" use it as a social we, but seems to take for granted that it is universal for humanity as such.

I don't think it's much of a joke, but then again, my sense of humor has waned over the years.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I don't think it's much of a joke, but then again, my sense of humor has waned over the years.

Well, fair enough.

 

[Mock Turtle]

Well, all humans are a member of humanity, but from there doesn't follow that you and I are a case of we otherwise for all usages of we.
I mean for morality if you and I have a different understanding of that we are not the same as we have the same understanding of morality.
In fact for a similar case of how to act, we don't necessary act the same, thus we are not a case of we act in the same manner.
That is basic sociology and part of how we are different for different sub-cultures within humanity.

So you and I are in the group of we, unless I am one of them. It is that simple.

I always thought it was a case of simply battering them with 'our' superior intellect, and if this fails, simply battering them.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I always thought it was a case of simply battering them with 'our' superior intellect, and if this fails, simply battering them.

In the name of Objective Reality, I am better than you and if that is not enough I hit you with Objective Reality.

 

[Mock Turtle]

In the name of Objective Reality, I am better than you and if that is not enough I hit you with Objective Reality.

No such thing - not in the human universe.