kai
ragamuffin
Its called the fog of war. Once it starts you never know whats going to happen.
you know what WY? i never heard of the fog of planning.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Its called the fog of war. Once it starts you never know whats going to happen.
as you say we are in agreement.
i will point out that its not a soldiers job to plan what the heck your going to do with Iraq when the jackboot is lifted off the neck of seething mass of resentment. Politicians! what can you do with them?
Maybe it's just me, but I'd like to send the politicians off to fight in the war.
You know - give them a chance to earn some credibility for their claims of patriotism.
Well, in this case, it was the fog of stupidity and arrogance, prior to war.
The fog of war is usually used to describe the way information gets muddled and miscommunicated once the war has begun.
you know what WY? i never heard of the fog of planning.
Why plan when you think that your so powerful you can do what ever you want.
Why plan when you think that your so powerful you can do what ever you want.
Its called the fog of war. Once it starts you never know whats going to happen.
Well, there is the fog of war, certainly.
Then there is a compelte and utter ineptitude and lack of planning for the occupation stage.
I thought the past administration the epitomie of arrogant for expecting the Iraqi people to fall gratefully to their knees, get up and carry on like some suburb cul-de-sac nieghborhood.
quote]The violent history between the different groups was there and Bushco was warned by experts as well.[/
Thats the puzzle for me, whats the reasoning for disbanding the army and police and then when the Iraqi state totally collapses and all hell breaks loose wonder why all the condemnation? what do you think was the reason for that?
Thats the puzzle for me, whats the reasoning for disbanding the army and police and then when the Iraqi state totally collapses and all hell breaks loose wonder why all the condemnation? what do you think was the reason for that?
I am well aware and understand the reasoning behind the invasion and the ousting of Saddam, what i am puzzled over is the lack of planning for a post war Iraq without an army or police force.
I don't think anyone really asked and no news discussed exactly how we were going to do anything in the future sense. That information is classified for 20 years because its national security issues.
i think its pretty common knowledge that post war planning was woefully inadequate. I am just wondering why?
My view is the invasion and ousting of the regime went almost like clockwork a military success.--------- Then it all went down hill, most of the criticism of the "Iraq war" and statistics used in support are from the post war period.
It was a spectacular blunder in my view.
The war was conducted by professional military officers. The postwar was conducted by political hacks appointed by Bush and Cheney. In most cases, the hacks were young, knew nothing about Iraq, and knew nothing about their asigned fields.