The Kilted Heathen
Crow FreyjasmaðR
The inconsistent details. While Galatians is older than Acts, it is presented later in biblical narration. An odd decision by those who compiled the biblical canon, to be sure. Either way it is read, the story changes in ways that make it seem very much a fish-tale. Re-arranging it chronologically by writing makes it even more seeming "Ah, yes now I remember--this is how it was!"Paul's own account is much older than that of Acts which is not authored by any of the Apostles. What is found in Acts is the theology of its author, thus the added details.
Also, though the author of Acts is most commonly and strongly believed to be a companion of Paul named Luke, most of the accounts are offered in the first person, giving indication that this "Luke" acted as a scribe to Paul, who dictated the content to be written.