Paraprakrti
Custom User
You may want to revise your post, (Q)
You apparently missed that analogy of the apple. Seva explained one who lacks the *taste* and wishes to argue the *taste* of an apple, not the existence of the apple itself. So the fact that you can see the apple is irrelevant to the analogy. Unless you can taste by seeing.
You apparently missed that analogy of the apple. Seva explained one who lacks the *taste* and wishes to argue the *taste* of an apple, not the existence of the apple itself. So the fact that you can see the apple is irrelevant to the analogy. Unless you can taste by seeing.