Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Isn't that The Simpsons?You been fishing off windscale? I hear two headed fish are 10 a penny around there.
I have trouble agreeing with myself in just one head, imagine the confusion with 2 or 3
Isn't that The Simpsons?
Oh, I don’t know. I’m of two minds on this decision.Or are they? Given a choice (mandated), as to having two heads or three, which would you choose - after all two's company but three's a crowd!
Any preferences, and reasons as to why?
(Hopefully not laughing at any who do find themselves in such a position)
View attachment 42944
I think, I would prefer 3 heads, because then you could always voteOr are they? Given a choice (mandated), as to having two heads or three, which would you choose - after all two's company but three's a crowd!
Any preferences, and reasons as to why?
(Hopefully not laughing at any who do find themselves in such a position)
View attachment 42944
Or are they? Given a choice (mandated), as to having two heads or three, which would you choose - after all two's company but three's a crowd!
Any preferences, and reasons as to why?
(Hopefully not laughing at any who do find themselves in such a position)
View attachment 42944
Four heads are better than two...
But one might hold a grudge.An odd number of heads makes decisions and resolves disputes. An even number of heads cannot resolve disputes. Majority rules.
Not if they alternate authority - Mondays one, Tuesday the other, etc. ..As others already said, you need an odd number to prevent a stalemate. From the triumvirate of the Roman empire to judges today, odd numbers have always worked best to make decisions.
(And seemingly having only two choices is called a false dilemma.)
You mean like with the parties in the US: eight years of dems, eight years of pubs?Not if they alternate authority - Mondays one, Tuesday the other, etc. ..
Hopefully the two heads would have some common aims, unlike these.You mean like with the parties in the US: eight years of dems, eight years of pubs?
That's exactly what I called the false dilemma. It looks like a difference when you only have two options. In reality they both want the same thing: betraying their constituency while pleasing their donors.Hopefully the two heads would have some common aims, unlike these.