Trump's bond reduced to 175 million

[PoetPhilosopher]

N.Y. appeals court reduces Trump's bond in his civil fraud case to $175 million, a victory for the former president

The court also gave Trump an additional 10 days to post the bond, which the former president said Monday he would pay.

www.nbcnews.com

It says he has 10 days to pay it.

Anyway, today was the day when we would likely know more about the 464m case, and well, I guess this is the news on it, and what the court decided to do with this particular case.

 

[Revoltingest]

No doubt he'll complain about
a conspiracy against him even as
he gets preferential treatment.

 

[Laniakea]

No doubt he'll complain about
a conspiracy against him even as
he gets preferential treatment.

He went through the legal process and a judge found in his favor.
Only TDS would cause anyone to automatically assume that a judge ruling in Trump's favor is "preferential treatment".

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

There was no reason given, and far more people are forc

He went through the legal process and a judge found in his favor.
Only TDS would cause anyone to automatically assume that a judge ruling in Trump's favor is "preferential treatment".

The court gave no reason for its decision, and I am not aware of whether it does or does not regularly do the same for others, but suspect not. If you have more information to suggest otherwise, then I consider this to be nothing but preferential treatment for a man who regularly claims to have "tons of cash" and then gets his gullible base to send him some so he can pay his lawyers and buy more McDonalds burgers.

 

[Revoltingest]

He went through the legal process and a judge found in his favor.
Only TDS would cause anyone to automatically assume that a judge ruling in Trump's favor is "preferential treatment".

Only one in love with Trump would rejoice.

 

[Laniakea]

There was no reason given, and far more people are forc

The court gave no reason for its decision, and I am not aware of whether it does or does not regularly do the same for others, but suspect not. If you have more information to suggest otherwise, then I consider this to be nothing but preferential treatment for a man who regularly claims to have "tons of cash" and then gets his gullible base to send him some so he can pay his lawyers and buy more McDonalds burgers.

Just show us evidence that he was given "preferential treatment".
Trump is going through the legal process and the law found in his favor. If it had gone the other way, you guys would have had no problem with it.

 

[Laniakea]

Only one in love with Trump would rejoice.

REJOICE!!!

 

[metis]

Trump is going through the legal process and the law found in his favor. If it had gone the other way, you guys would have had no problem with it.

Huh? That's complete nonsense as the verdicts are nowhere close to being in!

 

[Revoltingest]

REJOICE!!!
View attachment 89886

Not a fan of Jenocide Joe

 

[Laniakea]

Huh? That's complete nonsense as the verdicts are nowhere close to being in!

Nor do they have to be going through the legal process.

 

[Pogo]

Just show us evidence that he was given "preferential treatment".
Trump is going through the legal process and the law found in his favor. If it had gone the other way, you guys would have had no problem with it.

Favor or disfavor will not be determined to the end of the appeal, this is only a modification of the procedure due to unusual circumstances.

I suspect if she wanted to Letitia James could well appeal this ruling with a reasonable chance of success but won't because it would only create a further delay which is what Trump wants.


Question, is English your first language?

 

[Laniakea]

Favor or disfavor will not be determined to the end of the appeal, this is only a modification of the procedure due to unusual circumstances.

thank you for debunking the idea that Trump just received preferential treatment.

 

[Pogo]

thank you for debunking the idea that Trump just received preferential treatment.

Not what was said, reducing his bond is not a ruling regarding his trial and judgement for fraud.

As to preferential treatment, it appears that reduction of bond is not a common practice and so could be considered preferential however as no justification was written, who is to say.
More silence to avoid more nonsense commenting etc.

 

[Laniakea]

Not what was said, reducing his bond is not a ruling regarding his trial and judgement for fraud.

As to preferential treatment, it appears that reduction of bond is not a common practice and so could be considered preferential however as no justification was written, who is to say.
More silence to avoid more nonsense commenting etc.

It happens. How Long Does It Take to Get a Bond Reduction? - Law Office of Case J. Darwin Inc.

 

[Pogo]

It happens. How Long Does It Take to Get a Bond Reduction? - Law Office of Case J. Darwin Inc.

I didn't say it didn't, but in the case of civil judgement bonds for appeal it is rare. For criminal bail which is what your article is about, yes it is not infrequent. Apples and Kumquats

 

[Laniakea]

I didn't say it didn't, but in the case of civil judgement bonds for appeal it is rare. For criminal bail which is what your article is about, yes it is not infrequent. Apples and Kumquats

This is an exceptional case in that it has a fine of nearly 1/2 billion dollars. That is rarely seen in a civil case. Not to mention all the unusual ways the prosecution went about the whole thing in the first place.

 

[Pogo]

This is an exceptional case in that it has a fine of nearly 1/2 billion dollars. That is rarely seen in a civil case. Not to mention all the unusual ways the prosecution went about the whole thing in the first place.

We have already listed bonds larger than trumps and million dollar plus bonds are not really rare. What is exceptional is Trump only and again, it is not a fine.

 

[Laniakea]

We have already listed bonds larger than trumps and million dollar plus bonds are not really rare. What is exceptional is Trump only and again, it is not a fine.

I agree that Trump is exceptional. That is why I vote for him.

 

[Callisto]

I agree that Trump is exceptional. That is why I vote for him.

True. He's an exceptional liar, an exceptional grifter, an exceptional con man, an exceptional grifter ...

 

[Laniakea]

True. He's an exceptional liar, an exceptional grifter, an exceptional con man, an exceptional grifter ...

An exceptional communicator, an exceptional husband, an exceptional president....
See, I don't use hateful speech.