Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'd be curious to know how many of those charges are actually for "colluding with Russia?"Once again, 187 guilty pleas to criminal indictments vs zero with Clinton investigation. For people who are so content to shout 'lock her up' there's some surprisingly little introspection into one's own party of active criminals.
Well if you get a warrant for searching a car for drugs but find unregistered weapons, you won't ignore it just because that's not what you were looking for.I'd be curious to know how many of those charges are actually for "colluding with Russia?"
(I thought that was supposedly the point of the investigations.... But then I've been wrong before....)
Granted. But that's really not the point!Well if you get a warrant for searching a car for drugs but find unregistered weapons, you won't ignore it just because that's not what you were looking for.
Here is a breakdown of the indictments so far:
All of Robert Mueller’s indictments and plea deals in the Russia investigation so far
You list your religion as Christian.I'd be curious to know how many of those charges are actually for "colluding with Russia?"
(I thought that was supposedly the point of the investigations.... But then I've been wrong before....)
Many of the guilt findings to date have been for:Well if you get a warrant for searching a car for drugs but find unregistered weapons, you won't ignore it just because that's not what you were looking for.
Here is a breakdown of the indictments so far:
All of Robert Mueller’s indictments and plea deals in the Russia investigation so far
Based on your postings, there are a few not so nice assumptions one could make about you, too. Perhaps you should put "bigot" beside yours.You list your religion as Christian.
You support a liar and fornicator.
As you said, you've been wrong.
Many of the guilt findings to date have been for:
Lying to the FBI
Lying to Congress
Conspiracy
But we do not know what they were lying about or who they were conspiring with.
To me, Flynn is especially interesting.
By now it's quite clear that Flynn did speak with Kislyak about sanctions. The meat of the matter is what did he lie about and why did he lie?All of Robert Mueller’s indictments and plea deals in the Russia investigation so far
In December 2016, during the transition, Flynn spoke to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about sanctions that President Barack Obama had just placed on Russia, and about a planned United Nations Security Council vote condemning Israeli settlements.
But when FBI agents interviewed him about all this in January 2017, Flynn lied to them about what his talks with Kislyak entailed, he now admits.
We now know he lied when he originally said he never met with Kislyak. We now know he lied to Pence. What we, the general public, don't yet know is that he met with Kislyak on the orders of Trump with a specific agenda.
Flynn was the good little General in service to his commanding officer. It's ludicrous to think that he would have met with Kislyak on his own. Trump ordered him to do it and Flynn followed orders. It wasn't just Flynn that lied to Pence. Trump also lied to his VP.
We now know the meeting with Kislyak was about sanctions. What we, the general public, don't yet know is that Flynn was the middleman conveying Trump's message to Putin: Thanks for the emails - don't worry about the sanctions - now or later.
Please show what I have posted that makes me out to be a bigot. Please show what I have posted that leads you to suggest that one could make a few not so nice assumptions about me.Based on your postings, there are a few not so nice assumptions one could make about you, too. Perhaps you should put "bigot" beside yours.
We now know the meeting with Kislyak was about sanctions.
Meanwhile we still sit and wait for his promised tax returns. Oh that's right, we're supposed to have forgotten about those. How silly of me to think they still mattered. Those are all old business.That will be the only thing I would agree with which would be protecting people by keeping intelligent sources classified on a need-to-know basis.
Otherwise I think it was an awesome move by Trump to finally put this into action to expose this Fiasco once and for all.
I never said it was. Did you bother to read my entire post?This isn't illegal as far as Flynn goes. Knowledge of the discussion is required to change this.
I never said it was. Did you bother to read my entire post?
Please accept my apologies. It would appear that I misread what you said. My oops on this one.Please show what I have posted that makes me out to be a bigot. Please show what I have posted that leads you to suggest that one could make a few not so nice assumptions about me.
No head shaking - just actual comments of mine. And please, do not resort to a nonsense dodge like, "You know what you said, I don't have time to go back and look".