Sorry, but the Bible condemns God in its own words again and again and again. That is why apologists have to be liars for Jesus. I have not seen one professional apologist that does not regularly lie for the Bible.
By the way, you should not use false accusations. Pointing out how the God of the Bible is evil and immoral is not "attacking God" unless you want to admit yourself that God is evil and immoral. We are just doing the same thing that you are doing . Reading your book of myths literally.
The whole "God is love" theme is the main message of Christianity, so of course, we would be hard pressed to find a Christian who would honestly admit that God creates evil, just as the Bible clearly states in Isaiah 45:7. We can expect Christians to adamantly deny that their "loving, merciful" God creates evil or that he creates disasters and calamities. It doesn't surprise me that they don't want to admit that their "loving, merciful" God purposely inflicts pain and suffering on mankind. As a former Christian, I'm aware that blaming humans or the devil for the evil in the world is far easier on a Christian's conscience than blaming the "kind and merciful" God that a Christian actually believes in and has faith in. I think it takes a lot of courage for a Christian to honestly admit that if the Bible is true, then God is truly a barbaric and sadistic monster who is morally responsible for the cosmic mess he made, not humanity or Lucifer.
"God is love" is central to their evangelistic strategy and is intended to persuade nonbelievers to accept Christianity. Christians are more likely to have new converts with messages like "God is love" or "God loves you," rather than with a message like "God is love, but you should know that the Bible states that God causes evil, disasters, and calamities." So, it makes sense that Christians would want nonbelievers to reject the verses that state that God creates evil, that God forces a rape victim to wed her rapist, that God orders the execution of witches, that God commanded the Israelites to kill every man, woman, child, and infant from another nation, and finally, that God drowned every human being on earth—all but one family—in a worldwide flood. I think it is natural for Christians to prefer that nonbelievers focus on and believe only the positive scriptures about God's alleged benevolence, love, and mercy while dismissing the verses regarding his cruel and sadistic treatment of mankind. I can understand why they would want to deny these contradictions to God's alleged goodness and love for humanity. It seems like the Bible is only the "Word of God" when Christians agree with certain scriptures. Otherwise, some of them claim that God didn't inspire all of the Bible, only parts of it. That's very convenient, isn't it?
How many people do you think Christians would persuade to convert to Christianity if they used some of the horrifying Bible stories in their gospel message? It makes sense that Christians would vehemently reject the idea that God creates evil, disasters, and calamities.