There is wide disagreement about what are & aren't rights.Not exactly since anarchist do have a conception of natural humans rights at the core of their ideology.
Without a body of law enforced by government limited by
a constitution, it would be a mess of anarchy & oppression.
And competing interests would raise their own armies.No it doesn't. (though a militia on call to protect's people natural rights would exist)
Essentially, order would be enforced by these various
groups.
This isn't clear.You can make all the economic association of your choice and start any business of your choice whenever you want. The only trick is that you own wht you use which means all your employees, all your partners, if you have any and aren't a one person business, would have an equal share in the process and interest of your business.
Anarchy doesn't appear to have the stability of otherIt depends on the type of anarchism and the circumstances. It could indeed transform in a number of thing from a more classical representative democracy with a decentralised structure to a brutal dictatorship ruled by some crazed warlord, but that can be true of any form of government or organisation. They are all subject to changes and risks.
systems. I prefer a constitutional democratic republic.