Not that it matters much, but the paper was published in
Physical Review Letters (I can provide you with the PRL version if you want it; I haven't checked to see if it differs at all from the arXiv version).
There are several of various sorts. A few you might find interesting include:
Handsteiner, J., Friedman, A. S., Rauch, D., Gallicchio, J., Liu, B., Hosp, H., ... & Zeilinger, A. (2017). Cosmic bell test: measurement settings from milky way stars.
Physical review letters,
118(6), 060401.
Wu, C., Bai, B., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Yang, M., Cao, Y., ... & Pan, J. W. (2017). Random number generation with cosmic photons.
Physical review letters,
118(14), 140402.
The BIG Bell Test Collaboration. Challenging local realism with human choices. Nature 557, 212–216 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0085-3
I've attached the first two but ran into size limits with the third.
However, it should be noted that
1) You can't actually ultimately close this loophole in its strongest form of superdeterminism and
2) As I stated in an earlier post, Renner and co-author are suggesting an ontic interpretation (of sorts; as you are no doubt aware this gets murky quickly) but one in which the wave function is irreducibly statistical.