Super Universe said:
And all the matter in the universe expands from this central point with no gravity involved whatsoever?
Are you not aware that there are other forces than gravity? And that gravity is in fact the weakest force? In the early stages of the Universe all matter was part of a quark-gluon plasma. At those levels, the nuclear and electromagnetic forces would have far outweighed the strength of gravity.
Super Universe said:
What do you think is going to happen when we build a large space interferometer and find out that the universe is thousands of times larger than we now believe?
Firstly, how do you know that the universe is so much bigger? Secondly, the idea that the Universe is bigger would not come as a surprise, we already know that most of it is dark matter and dark energy. Thirdly, how would any of that change anything? How would it make any of what you're saying more likely?
Super Universe said:
If matter doesn't have to come from anywhere then why the need for a big bang theory?
I said that matter was not created during the Big Bang. I didn't say that the Universe has existed for an infinite amount of time, or that the distribution of matter has been fairly stable.
Super Universe said:
I know there is non-space/time. YOU don't know it and scientists won't for a thousand years, mmm, maybe 900 if your lucky. Time has to do with movement in the relativity regions of space. There are perfectly stable regions. I could tell you where it is but I won't. It's really quite logical though.
How do you know there is non-space/time?
Time is a dimension, like one of the spatial dimensions. No further explanation necessary.
"Relativity regions of space" doesn't even make grammatical sense, let alone scientific sense.
If you refuse to tell me things, do you not think that just suggests that you don't have an answer?
Super Universe said:
Creating does not violate the laws of physics. The universe was created by the same being who created the laws to govern it.
Creating does violate the laws of physics. It violates the conservation laws. Are they not laws of physics. If the creator of the Universe wanted a Universe where things could be created, why wouldn't he create a Universe without conservation laws? Because our's certainly has them.
Super Universe said:
No, I'm not giving away the fundamental unit of matter. But I told you where to find it and I actually thought it was too much. Isn't it always better when things are earned?
Once again, you just make it more and more obvious that you are avading giving answers. Acting knowledgable will get you nowhere unless you are prepared to prove that you know what you're talking about.
Super Universe said:
Meditation travels the universe faster than light?
But what are the laws of physics of another dimension? What are the laws that apply to angels? You want everything handed to you with no effort but you'll get nothing unearned. No scientist will ever discover anything new with such a closed mind. Maybe make that two thousand years before the theory of non-space/time.
Yes, there are theories of higher dimensions, and some of those allow for faster than light travel, because the speed of light could be higher in higher dimensions. However, firstly, all of these theories are rather controversial. Secondly, even if we assume that they're true, then in order to access the higher dimensions, you need enormous energy, beyond what the entire world can produce as yet. So how would somone meditating get that energy?
There are no laws for angels, because there is no evidence for angels. If we ever find any, we'll come up with some laws for them.
You are the same as every new-ager and hater of science. Your instant reaction to any rejection of an idea is that scientists have closed minds. That is not the case. Have you given a single piece of evidence? If scientists were not as skeptical as they are, science would never progress. We would be waylaid investigating every minor theory that someone thought of off the top of their head. Once you give evidence, you can be taken seriously.Once again I ask you to make predictions.
Super Universe said:
This matter that expanded from the big bang (you capitalize it like it had a will of it's own), before the bang happened this matter was obviously somewhere else then wasn't it? Somewhere that gravity had no effect because then it would just clump all this matter together in one giant black hole? Sounds a lot like non-space/time to me but that's just a guess.
Since when does capitalising something mean it has a will of its own? As far as I'm concerned, the Big Bang is a proper noun.
No, the matter was not anywhere else. Before the Big Bang does not exist. It's like saying what's north of the North Pole.
Super Universe said:
A non-time being only needs a memory to put passing events in the proper order. No time needed for non-time beings.
If a being is outside of time, there wouldn't be any passing events.
Super Universe said:
I can make any claim I wish to sir, as I've stated before "None of this is intended for you" and we are far from my goal on this thread. I'm not going to hand you the building blocks of the universe or a grand unification theory, earn it yourself. Did you think Einstein was so smart to figure out space/time on his own?
What was the intention of this thread then? To try and convince those with no knowledge of the basics of science whatsoever that the soul exists? I'm sorry I am not ignorant enough to be of service.
Super Universe said:
What do I have to say to a scientist? This "Scientists chase ever after a train that they hear just ahead of them, but it is only the sound of a train."
Those futile attempts at chasing after that train have given us the computer that I'm sitting at now, the internet that connects that computer to allow me to send this message so that you can read it, they've given us the electricity to run that computer, they've put men on the moon, they've saved countless lives. What have crackpots like you done for humanity please?
Super Universe said:
Why does it take many people to run a universe? How many does it take to run a country? How many teachers do we have? How many messengers? How many judges? How many CEO's, advisors, repairmen?
What is that supposed to prove? Shall I list things that exist that don't need running. The Universe is not a country, or a court, or any of those things. All of the things you listed are concepts created by man. The Universe is not man-made but natural. There is no reason to assume that it must be run by some higher being.
Super Universe said:
The earth rests atop a needle stacked end to end with a million needles. That is why it is impossible for the universe to exist in the way it does without beings controlling it.
What are you trying to say here?
Super Universe said:
Me confidant? I know absolutely, positively, without a doubt that God exists and that He created the universe. Everything else is a work in progress.Me enlightened? Only with the answer that most matters.
So basically, what you are saying is that you know that God exists, from what reasoning is unclear, but you somehow know this, and everything else must fit in with that assumption?