RobertAlexander
I am living fire.
You are speaking of an ancient event. I am speaking of a new one.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You are speaking of an ancient event. I am speaking of a new one.
The point I am making is that Christianity had it's time.
I am not here to understand your symbolism let alone care what you are "telling me", this is the Setian DIR and you are in a different world altogether.you clearly do no understand what I am telling you because of the fact that you are misinterpreting my symbolism.
Mine is not an Ego you wish to toy with.
Yawning.. nothing new. The whole enlightment era said the same. Nietzsche made the point moot. The boring thing about this is that it is just the usual phase of rationalism that occurs in every civilisation towards its end. The ancient Greeks had their Nietzsche too, his name was Plutarch. Ok, he didn't kill Jesus because Jesus was still to be born, he killed Pan. Crete even has a "tomb of Zeus".
And so what? Some centuries later, the rationalism's great announcements hadn't come true. Neither have they come true today. Back then, rationalism degraded into being one intellectual options among many, leading to the "second religiosity", as Spengler called it.
This phase is just ahead of us. And it won't draw on Set.
but of an inversive society being put in place.
Which would naturally imply the end of the existing society. And no, all the "God XYZ will erect his society"-blahblah (also coined as "the New Age will begin" or just "the Second Coming of Jesus", depending on the viewpoint of the speaker, but it is just the same structure) has just been wrong. Adding one more of these announcements isn't really a big deal. Not even if you happen to recycle the countless failed predictions by inserting the name of Set this time.