That was on the video? I must have missed it!What of this resembles a human being?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That was on the video? I must have missed it!What of this resembles a human being?
Some children will decide to follow the practices of their religious upbringing and others will not. The ones who do not will tend to blame the religion they were raised in as being a negative thing. The ones who stay will tend to speak of it as a positive thing.
As far as education goes, there are differing ideas as to what is most important to learn.
The thing is, protecting MY freedom to exercise my religion also protects your freedom to not be religious.
Why hasn't that occurred to you guys?
It probably wasn't covered because it's a blob of a few cells that doesn't look like or resemble a human.That was on the video? I must have missed it!
Try again after you've better read my position, as you have entirely misrepresented it.
What of this resembles a human being?
You say this as if I haven't considered it all. And you haven't addressed my points of self-awareness (albeit this is an awkward and not the best argument), that early stages (I posted pictures of far earlier than nine months to show how little you actually know) don't resemble humans, and that we couldn't manage all the people we'd have if we didn't have abortions. And with some women (and men), they are a mercy. Without, our population would be double, up to about triple of what it is now. It's unmanageable. You (and others) also ignore my position that I am very pro-sex ed to reduce the amount of unwanted to pregnancies, which reduces the amount of abortions, safely and effectively. And lets be honest, so very typically and often the pro-life crowd does stop caring about a fetus once it's born. After that it's very typical of them to vote and fight to take away and reduce the benefits that former-fetus may have, not ensure it has a good education, not move to see to it's healthcare, and no assurances there will be adequate activities, role models, and opportunities to make for an successful and well adjusted adulthood.You know what the difference is between the cells you posted sketches of and that newborn is?
nine months. Other than that? The DNA is the same. The sex is established. All the characteristics of the human being grown here is established, genetically. The ONLY thing that will keep that cell from becoming a human adult is....death.
An insightful article that really speaks to me.
The limits of religious freedom: America must come to grips with when faith groups limit personal liberty
The willful ignorance of some people to not recognize the harm done to others due to one's religious beliefs is probably the highlight of cognitive dissonance.
Yeah, go ahead and name me one 20th century regime that acted on and for atheism.And harm done by atheists in terms of some large regimes of the 20th century?
You say this as if I haven't considered it all. And you haven't addressed my points of self-awareness (albeit this is an awkward and not the best argument), that early stages (I posted pictures of far earlier than nine months to show how little you actually know) don't resemble humans,
And with some women (and men), they are a mercy. Without, our population would be double, up to about triple of what it is now. It's unmanageable. You (and others) also ignore my position that I am very pro-sex ed to reduce the amount of unwanted to pregnancies, which reduces the amount of abortions, safely and effectively.
And lets be honest, so very typically and often the pro-life crowd does stop caring about a fetus once it's born.
After that it's very typical of them to vote and fight to take away and reduce the benefits that former-fetus may have, not ensure it has a good education, not move to see to it's healthcare, and no assurances there will be adequate activities, role models, and opportunities to make for an successful and well adjusted adulthood.
No, because early embryonic stages objectively do not have a humanoid figure or appearance. And, "medically and scientifically," there actually isn't a consensus. There isn't a consensus as to what constitutes as alive and dead, either.OK, that's a CLASSIC 'no true scott' fallacy.
And it only works if you define 'human' in such a way as to specifically eliminate those early stages. Or, if you define 'human' as 'person,' which of course would be begging the question.
Where did you get that? (no where) And, I'm curious, who do you think "those guys" I'm with is?Uh huh.....and yet it is you guys who make it so difficult for those infants to find families who can take care of that.
Where did you get that? (no where) And, I'm curious, who do you think "those guys" I'm with is?
Well, you tend to do that to yourselves by aligning with politicians who come with an agenda of hating the poor and doing everything they can to make their lives harder than they already are.By 'you guys' I mean the group you have aligned yourself with: the pro-abortionists who say that anti-abortionists don't care about babies once they are born.
I missed this, but it deserves special attention because it's another bull**** example of freedom of religion going too far, and that is with conservative-Christian-based adoption agencies, such as the Catholics, prohibiting adoption to homosexual couples. And you talk about forcing a woman to go through with a pregnancy anyways to give birth to a child who will be adopted, when there are already TONS of children already who need adopted.I'll tell you who doesn't care; the government and those liberal idiots who won't let children go to good adoptive families because their birth mother/father MIGHT object.
And you are aware that late term abortions are only performed under extreme cases where it is necessary in order to save the mother's life, correct?
Yeah, go ahead and name me one 20th century regime that acted on and for atheism.