Whether or not the Buddha claimed to be superior to God/god(s), or if a god claimed superiority is largely irrelevant to me. My position is this:
(My premise, personally verified) : Since the Buddhist teachings concur with my personal experience, and I personally know that the teachings are enlightened,
(My conclusion) : therefore I conclude that the individual who originated and/or taught those teachings is an enlightened one (aka "Buddha").
Or, in short: Dhamma (teachings) -> therefore Buddha.
The reverse does not hold true to me; that is:
(Premise, which I cannot personally verify) : the claim that because the source is presumably enlightened (e.g. "God", a prophet, etc.),
(Conclusion) therefore its alleged scriptures/teachings must also be enlightened (e.g. "Bible", "Koran", "Kitabi Aqdas", "Vedas", etc.)
"God" -> therefore scripture/teachings.
Personal feeling can be very deceptive and you have no way to very if Buddha's teachings are enlightened. If they make you feel spiritual comfortable, that is your decision to follow them. lol