Yet you responded to my post without any understanding of what I had said.
Where is your "reliable link" that the story of Christ was a reproduction of the Horus myth?
In that myth Horus wasn't the dying/rising god, it was Osiris.
There are never reproductions between pagan myths, each one is different.
PhD R. Carrier
"Every single one of those beliefs was different from every other. The differences are what establish them as
different gods, and not just revamped versions of the same god. The differences are irrelevant. Cultural
diffusion and
syncretism by definition always produces differences between the originating, existing beliefs and the resulting, new beliefs. So it is illogical to argue that because God A is “different” from God B, that therefore God B’s mythology was not adapted from God A’s. To the contrary, ideas that are witnessed as pervasive (many different kinds of virgin births; many different kinds of resurrections) are seen as bearing a cultural commonality (“a” virgin birth; “a” resurrection), and that commonality is then adapted to a specific belief system, creating a new religion. The process always involves transformation: the creation of differences. Those differences are what is brought by the native,
adopting culture, and then added, to transform the
adopted culture."
But they are all part of a savior god mytheme and a sub-mytheme is the dying/rising god
"Not all these savior gods were dying-and-rising gods. That was a sub-mytheme. Indeed, dying-and-rising gods (
and mere men) were a
broader mytheme; because examples abounded even
outside the context of known savior cults (I’ll give you a nearly complete list below). But
within the savior cults, a particular brand of dying-and-rising god arose. And Jesus most closely corresponds to that mythotype.
Other savior gods within this context experienced “passions” that did not involve a death. For instance,
Mithras underwent some great suffering and struggle (we don’t have many details), through which he acquired his power over death that he then shares with initiates in his cult, but we’re pretty sure it wasn’t a death. Mentions of resurrection as a teaching in Mithraism appear to have been about the
future fate of his
followers (in accordance with the Persian Zoroastrian notion of a general resurrection later borrowed by the Jews). So all those internet memes listing Mithras as a dying-and-rising god? Not true. So do please stop repeating that claim. Likewise, so far as we can tell
Attis didn’t become a rising god until well after Christianity began (and even then his myth only barely equated to a resurrection; previous authors have over-interpreted evidence to the contrary). Most others, however, we have pretty solid evidence for as
actually dying, and
actually rising savior gods."
Article and sources:
Dying-and-Rising Gods: It's Pagan, Guys. Get Over It. • Richard Carrier