But who is the terrorist and who is the freedom fighter?
George Washington launched a war against the British Empire. Robert E Lee launched a war against the U.S. Empire.
It gets confusing.
Tom
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Terrorism
- Thread starter Thief
- Start date
George Washington launched a war against the British Empire. Robert E Lee launched a war against the U.S. Empire.
It gets confusing.
Tom
Jeeze, Louise....it was a joke about Thief's using "collaborate" when he meant "corroborate".
I knew that.
Which is why I didn't bother @Thief .
I asked you.
Who is the freedom fighter and who is the terrorist? AIM(American Indian Movement) or the USA government?
Tom
I wouldn't apply either of your chosen labels to these parties to a modern day dispute.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Yeah, but if you are willing, I would still like your take on the topic in this thread. If not, I get that.
It's right wing terrorists who are taking donations and using them to attack people.
Two answers. The cynical one: the winners were freedom fighters.
The odd one: the one that's on God's side.
BLM does take donations. BLM supporters shot 5 cops in Dallas.
Does that make BLM right wing terrorists?
Tom
What does successful mean in that sentence?
Islam and Christianity seem a lot more successful than BLM. Does that make Abrahamic religion more corrupt?
Tom
You aren't going to like it.Yeah, but if you are willing, I would still like your take on the topic in this thread. If not, I get that.
Even if they were once a terrorist (no link in the OP to verify the claim), this doesn't mean they're still one. People can reform
And even if they're still a terrorist, this doesn't mean they steer BLM in a bad direction.
Nor would one terrorist in BLM characterize the entire group
See....I told you.
Nothing interesting here.
And even if they're still a terrorist, this doesn't mean they steer BLM in a bad direction.
Nor would one terrorist in BLM characterize the entire group
See....I told you.
Nothing interesting here.
There should be a cynicism award for that post equating success with automatic corruption.
Piculet
Active Member
It's relative. When someone speaks the truth wisely in a way that is truly relevant and significant, the majority are likely to either oppose it or ignore it. You can see that the majority of people have not accepted Christianity or Islam as their religion.
Last edited:
This doesn't make sense.
Christianity and Islam cover about half the entire human family. They dominate most of the world's most powerful governments and richest people.
BLM is comparatively tiny and insignificant. But you refer to BLM as successful and therefore probably corrupt, without saying why you think BLM is successful. Despite the clear fact that Islam alone is far more successful than BLM.
Frankly, I agree. Islam is far more successful and corrupt than little groups like BLM. Also, Christianity and Communism. But they aren't relevant to our discussion.
Tom