But who is the terrorist and who is the freedom fighter?I'm not a collaborator of terrorists.
George Washington launched a war against the British Empire. Robert E Lee launched a war against the U.S. Empire.
It gets confusing.
Tom
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But who is the terrorist and who is the freedom fighter?I'm not a collaborator of terrorists.
Jeeze, Louise....it was a joke about Thief's using "collaborate" when he meant "corroborate".But who is the terrorist and who is the freedom fighter?
George Washington launched a war against the British Empire. Robert E Lee launched a war against the U.S. Empire.
It gets confusing.
Tom
I knew that.Jeeze, Louise....it was a joke about Thief's using "collaborate" when he meant "corroborate".
I wouldn't apply either of your chosen labels to these parties to a modern day dispute.I knew that.
Which is why I didn't bother @Thief .
I asked you.
Who is the freedom fighter and who is the terrorist? AIM(American Indian Movement) or the USA government?
Tom
Why not?I wouldn't apply either of your chosen labels to these parties to a modern day dispute.
Because they'd be inaccurate.Why not?
I know.I do.
Jeeze, Louise....it was a joke about Thief's using "collaborate" when he meant "corroborate".
It's right wing terrorists who are taking donations and using them to attack people.well gee.....I saw a news report....
someone in charge of taking donations for Black Lives Matter
is a convicted terrorist
served 16yrs
anyone able to collaborate?
But who is the terrorist and who is the freedom fighter?
BLM does take donations. BLM supporters shot 5 cops in Dallas.It's right wing terrorists who are taking donations and using them to attack people.
What does successful mean in that sentence?The very fact that the Black lives Matter has become so successful is a sign it is probably corrupt.
You aren't going to like it.Yeah, but if you are willing, I would still like your take on the topic in this thread. If not, I get that.
There should be a cynicism award for that post equating success with automatic corruption.The very fact that the Black lives Matter has become so successful is a sign it is probably corrupt.
It's relative. When someone speaks the truth wisely in a way that is truly relevant and significant, the majority are likely to either oppose it or ignore it. You can see that the majority of people have not accepted Christianity or Islam as their religion.What does successful mean in that sentence?
Islam and Christianity seem a lot more successful than BLM. Does that make Abrahamic religion more corrupt?
Tom
This doesn't make sense.It's relative. When someone speaks the truth wisely in away that is truly relevant and significant, the majority are likely to either oppose it or ignore it. You can see that the majority of people have not accepted Christianity or Islam and their religion.