Students Are Pushing Back Against Gender Ideology In Their Schools

[Kfox]

Ya know what? I'll just let you keep running in circles amd tripping up over your arguements. You really just have no idea anyways, even though you do but keep circling back to try to say you do one thing but then say something that shows you do something entirely different, just to trip up and find yourself back at step 1 just to get to step 2, and the illogical nature of your position swells up and you get bounced back to where you started.

Wow! And I thought the guy claiming I have to check gentiles before referencing biology was about the most absurd thing I've ever heard, but I think you just one upped him!

 

[Kfox]

Of course you don't. Because you're judging/addressing people according to their gender expression.
And please stop pretending that we're talking about "100 different genders" here. That's just an obfuscation.

When I said a hundred, I didn’t mean exactly 100, I was referring to lots of them. New York City recognize 31 different genders

NYC Just Released a List of Officially Recognized Genders

NYC Just Released a List of Officially Recognized Genders

thefederalistpapers.org

So though not quite a hundred, there are lots of them according to the city of New York. Do you recognize dozens of genders? If so, how many do you recognize?

 

[Kfox]

Culture is a human thing, not an animal thing. You continue to argue in bad faith.

We are not talking about culture, we're talking about biology. Biology refers to animals AND humans.

 

[fantome profane]

Wow! And I thought the guy claiming I have to check gentiles before referencing biology was about the most absurd thing I've ever heard, but I think you just one upped him!

Whoa, are you saying you need to check anyone who is not Jewish?

This is getting into a weird area.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

When I refer to my dog as he/she, am I refering to my dog's gender? Or biology. Obviously biology because dogs don't have gender. If I can refer to my dog's biology this way, why can't I refer to a human's biology this way

You don't understand the difference between talking to a person and talking to a dog?

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Wow! And I thought the guy claiming I have to check gentiles before referencing biology was about the most absurd thing I've ever heard, but I think you just one upped him!

I just said what you're doing.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Culture is a human thing, not an animal thing. You continue to argue in bad faith.

Actually our primate cousins as well as dolphins, whales amd elephants have culture. Dolphins have even been noted for having language variations among different groups. From what I've personally observed I would even say crows and scrub jays (both corvids) have their own culture.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

No; I do believe you. I've never doubted that which is a figment of someone's imagination can result in real live actions from people who are very real.

Figment of the imagination, huh?

Mores - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

It's like cuss words. Those aren't written down but every culture has words and phrases you aren't supposed to say.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

No it’s a social construct. That means it’s the result of your thoughts.

Lots of people have been killed over figments of some very wild imaginations.

Which varies from person to person. Why? Because it’s the result of whats going inside of your head. If it only exist inside of your head, it is not real.

Again; what is appropriate varies from person to person.

The problem of the word real is that it only has a referent inside your head. Your system of real is not real according to your own system. And what is real varies from person to person.
Your problem is that you treat your subjectivity in your head as in effect objective. It is not.

You need to realize, I do not recognize the countless different genders people claim, because I equate gender with biology. However for people like you who believe in the countless numbers of gender, if someone is expressing gender in the way they present themselves, I perceive that expression as an indication of their biology, so when I refer to them, I am referring to their biology which is limited to male/female; and does not include aproagender, bigender, and the countless others that I am unable to distinguish one from the other.

That bold one is in your head and not real.

 

[Kfox]

You don't understand the difference between talking to a person and talking to a dog?

I said when I refer to my dog or a person. That's because when I speak to people, the only pronouns I use are you or your; I do not use he/she pronouns when speaking to people.

 

[Kfox]

The problem of the word real is that it only has a referent inside your head. Your system of real is not real according to your own system. And what is real varies from person to person.
Your problem is that you treat your subjectivity in your head as in effect objective. It is not.

No, I treat that which is going on inside your head as subjective.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

I said when I refer to my dog or a person. That's because when I speak to people, the only pronouns I use are you or your; I do not use he/she pronouns when speaking to people.

Irrelevant to my question.

Do you not understand the difference when talking to OR about a person and talking to OR about a dog?

 

[Kfox]

Irrelevant to my question.

Do you not understand the difference when talking to OR about a person and talking to OR about a dog?

No; what's the difference between talking about a dog vs talking about a person?

 

[ImmortalFlame]

No; what's the difference between talking about a dog vs talking about a person?

That says a lot about you.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

No, I treat that which is going on inside your head as subjective.

Literally all forms of address and methods of categorisation are subjective.

 

[Kfox]

That says a lot about you.

Yes; it says for me, talking about a dog is the same as talking about a person.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

Yes; it says for me, talking about a dog is the same as talking about a person.

The fact that you can't see the implication of that sentence is worrying to me.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

No, I treat that which is going on inside your head as subjective.

Yeah and nothing goes on inside your head. That you treat me for treating me a certain way is not in your head as a choice. You are so special that you are the only normal human, because nothing subjective goes on it your head. It is just that rest of us that have a disorder and are abnormal, because we are subjective.

 

[Kfox]

Yeah and nothing goes on inside your head. That you treat me for treating me a certain way is not in your head as a choice. You are so special that you are the only normal human, because nothing subjective goes on it your head. It is just that rest of us that have a disorder and are abnormal, because we are subjective.

Whaaaat??? That makes no sense. Again; I am saying your thoughts are subjective.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Whaaaat??? That makes no sense. Again; I am saying your thoughts are subjective.

Yes, and so are yours as back to your subjective thoughts about real. But you don't understand when you are subjective and you do subjective choices and norms.
BTW that it makes no sense to you, is subjective in you and not real as per your subjective rule of real.