You have to put commentary to scripture so I won't guess what you're implying. I can't read Kings James Version.
John 17:5 Now, Father, glorify me (Jesus) with your own self with the glory which I (the father) had with you (jesus) before the world existed.
Sounds like Jesus wanted his father to glorify him since father had already chosen for his son to be glorified even before the world existed.
John 17:6 I revealed your name to the people whom you have given me out of the world. They were yours, and you have given them to me. They have kept your word.
I (jesus) have revealed your name whom you (god) gave me (jesus) out to the world. They were yours (the father's) an you (the father) gave them to me (jesus). [As a result], they kept your word [through me-jesus]
No where in this does it say god's name. In Exodus, God says "I AM who I AM" with no reference to a specific name. To call him a name is to make him into our description when I could have sworn god cannot be described by us. Jesus didn't change Moses' laws.
You must believe jesus is god. I know he is not. Though, I've debated it with scripture both sides in fact on RF many times.
John 17: 26 I made known to them your name, and will make it known; that the love with which you loved me may be in them, and I in them."
The name that jesus said to god he'd made known is himself. Since the only way to get to god is jesus (hence john 3:16) and he is the light of the world, of course god would designate a special name for
his son.
The problem isn't about the name. God has no name. The problem is trinitarian thinking jesus is god only because of the type of relationship jesus had with his father. It's a total misconception, missing pronouns, conjunctions, and prepositions. But that's okay. People come to god in many ways. Some idolize the human christ, others do not.
It is what it is.