Epic Beard Man
Bearded Philosopher
Her choice.
True, but it does not mean I cannot critique it. There are things regardless of "free choice" are socially wrong.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Her choice.
That is just supposition. Are you following her every move with a video camera to provide evidence for this? Perhaps we just have to take her at her word that it is mainly non-sexual - and even if it wasn't, it would hardly amount to prostitution. Very many others do exactly the same when they date. Not that I condone this kind of thing (lots of similar stuff going on) since it might seem demeaning to many - like me for instance.
So moral high horse. Women will do what they have to, to support their families and if no decent paying work is available, they will market themselves in one way or another and why shouldn't they?
And when someone works in an office, bank, or store eight hours a day six days a week, that also implies that a person's time has monetary value--which it does in almost any modern-day society, unless we're talking about slavery or consensually free labor.
What's your point? Even if she chooses to be a prostitute, I don't see anything wrong with that provided all involved parties are consenting adults. Do you have a problem with consensual prostitution?
I am not seeing the problem either.
Personally, I can think of at least two jobs that people tend to find honorable that I would put securely behind hers.
Lets face it, the internet revolution is a game-changer. It connects people who have stuff to offer with others who want what they have and are willing to pay for it. No excuses, it's just pure economics. No-brainer really.
It does sound dangerous though. She wouldn't know who she's dating or what the intentions actually are.
She might end up with somebody like Rodney Alcala and never coming home.
If I pay a woman for her time and have sex with her, it is prostitution. I guess that is the Californian in me. Been in the dating game far too long to think that sometimes some women sell their time (and bodies) for a damn meal at Golden Corral. I just think it is a bad example to set for her daughter. Single parenthood is tough but I'd rather go through the tough times and struggle and be the example of an independent woman (in my case a man) for my daughter than show her that she can use her looks to use men for personal gain.
I think that I get your drifit, but some of that I just plain disagree, while I also think that you hold unrealistic expectations.Problem is the lack of demonstrating independence and hard work. The other problem is that she allowed this man to meet her daughter without any reassurance of the future that they'll be together. The problem is that she depends on this man's investment. The problem is that there is no distinction between men paying for her time and being an escort. The problem is that per article she already has a low opinion of the dating pool therefore she believes in using men for money. The problem is....You get my drift.
Source: Single mom supports teenage daughter by being paid to date
I guess going out and getting a job is too hard. Women like this set bad examples for young ladies and this continues the objectification of women. Sometimes I think some women in the U.S. have been conditioned to be objectified and like it.
I think that I get your drifit, but some of that I just plain disagree, while I also think that you hold unrealistic expectations.
For instance, if setting a bad example is an issue, I don't think it is any worse an example than that of, say, a military person or lawyer.
Technically, it may not be prostitution. There's enough of a loophole and plausible deniability that it may be free of any legal repercussions. But I get your point. I've seen a few articles about the "sugar daddy" phenomenon, and it seems like it could have some pitfalls. It also makes some men look like desperate suckers.
It also might send the wrong message. It might send a signal to some men that all women enjoy being objectified and are for sale, which may be the mentality at work which fueled the #metoo movement. A rich and powerful man might believe that he's giving money to and elevating the position of a woman, so therefore she "owes" him.
Very unrealistic, but not for that reason.Dude unrealistic? So it is unrealistic for me to teach my daughter or son to go out there and look for a job?
This sounds more than a little sexist.But come on though! Do you honestly think these guys who are desperate like you say, shelling out money not getting any nookie?
No mention of sexual services there - says more about your own "expectations" than it does about the lady concerned. This whole thing is about trying to brand her as a prostitute and thus a bad role model and you have no evidence for either.Did anyone catch this in the article?
"I was nervous because I didn’t want the men to expect anything. But I did point out on my profile that it would be no strings attached. I am good company, I am fun, but don’t expect anything out of this.”
This is a pure example of an escort service (quality mother here) it tells with "no strings attached," for the right price I'll spread my legs in a V-shape.