Well, nothing I've read or seen and no one I've asked has any credible concept of a real god, one with objective existence; nor is there any clear notion of 'godness', the quality a real god would have and a superscientist who could create universes and raise the dead would lack. So I hypothesize that neither of those ideas exista in any credible and coherent form. But I freely acknowledge that suitable counterexamples, that's to say, clear, meaningful and coherent definitions of 'real god' and 'real godness' would refute my hypothesis.Why suspicion?
It really does seem odd that after an historical record showing at least ten thousand years of religious beliefs of H sap sap, in 2019 there's still no test that will tell me whether this keyboard I'm typing on is God or not.