Hi Victor, namaste.
What's so special about his statements this time?
1. He directed his comments at college-aged athletes. They're practically kids. They're not celebrities. They're the not the kind of people who are usually the targets of such abuse.
2. And this is most "special" part: the context in which he made the comments was that he was comparing the players of the Rutgers team with the players of the Tennessee team. Both teams have a majority of African-American players. The Tennessee team tended to be more light-skinned/straighten-hair and the Rutgers team tended to be more dark-skinned/kinkier hair.
Bear that in mind as you read what Imus and his crew said:
IMUS:
That's some rough girls from Rutgers. Man, they got tattoos and --
McGUIRK:
Some hard-core hos.
IMUS:
That's some nappy-headed hos there. I'm gonna tell you that now, man, that's some -- woo. And the girls from Tennessee, they all look cute, you know, so, like -- kinda like -- I don't know.
McGUIRK:
A Spike Lee thing.
...ROSENBERG:
It was a tough watch. The more I look at Rutgers, they look exactly like the Toronto Raptors.
Translation: dark skin, kinky-hair = scary, repulsive, bad. light skin, straight hair = nice, attractive, good.
And the worst part of it is that he probably has no idea just how hurtful those comments were to those young women, and to other African-American women. For Imus and for many Americans, the racial dimension of their ideas of beauty and worth are so deeply ingrained that they're not even aware of them.
One doesn't have to hate based on race in order to be racist.