Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I don't think think it worsens anything.I don't think we should be trying to solve one problem by creating an even worse one. Do you?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't think think it worsens anything.I don't think we should be trying to solve one problem by creating an even worse one. Do you?
This isn't about what it can be. It's about what should be.Sex can be many things. It can be really important and special, such as between people that are actually romantic with each other. It can not be. Just like a massage.
This isn't about what it can be. It's about what should be.
It's not there choice if I have to pay for them to pretend they want it.And if you came across many females (or males) who told you it was their choice, would you be saying we should not allow this - their freedom of expression?
Paying for the pretense of desire IS coercion. Why can't you understand this?Whence comes this conception that it's necessarily harm?
I have never said that there is no harm in people who have to be sex workers, I think that's very harmful. You're assuming things are always the worst case scenario.
Let me be clear: nobody should be coerced into sex work. Nobody should feel like they have to do sex work because they have no other means to survive. So when I say legalize it, I'm obviously not talking about such scenarios. That's why I say legalize it and regulate it. It should be the business of consenting, non-coerced adults.
Paying for the pretense of desire IS coercion. Why can't you understand this?
So you were happy to exploit others, sexually, for lots of money. I get it. Would it only be bad if you were the one being exploited sexually?Ok, I agree; but as I said before: that's not what's being discussed.
Do you submit that it's impossible for someone to freely enter sex work of their own volition, without being coerced?
Let's look at why some porn actresses entered sex work:
Edit: I will add, I started stripping for pretty much many of the same reasons. It sounded fun, I knew there was a lot of money to be had, I figured it was a good way to stay in shape because I had friends that were doing pole aerobics. It was fun.
Now prostitution was never a thing I considered, stripping was as far as I felt personally comfortable. But clearly there are people that are willing and unbothered.
It's a question that society decides. I am just offering my opinion, and why I hold it. And so far, not a single person has explained to me why having sex with strangers when you don't want to should even be considered a legitimate job.You decide that for everyone? For me? What I get to do with my body on the weekends?
So you were happy to exploit others, sexually, for lots of money. I get it. Would it only be bad if you were the one being exploited sexually?
It's a question that society decides. I am just offering my opinion, and why I hold it. And so far, not a single person has explained to me why having sex with strangers when you don't want to should even be considered a legitimate job.
Yes, you are wrong. I value the human right to respect, dignity, and autonomy. No one should have to have sex with anyone else when they don't want to. And the exchange of money does not magically erase that right. Nor should we as a society pretend that it does.Because it doesn’t make sense. I’m trying to understand you, but all I’m really seeing is the argument “I really value sex as something special between romantic partners (and never anything else) and I think everyone else should see it my way too.” Am I wrong?
You think making ugly people pay for sex is not making the problem worse? And not just for them, but for those who have to provide the pretense of desire?I don't think think it worsens anything.
You think making ugly people pay for sex is not making the problem worse? And not just for them, but for those who have to provide the pretense of desire?
No. I think people who were denied their natural urges can find solace with such accommodations and who's to say there are not people out there who enjoy providing and receiving such services?You think making ugly people pay for sex is not making the problem worse? And not just for them, but for those who have to provide the pretense of desire?
Yes, but to a far lesser degree. And only because it's an unnecessary service. Also, if it paid as it should, I suspect you wouldn't have minded so much.I gave lap dances to men and I’m a lesbian. Still more fun and less uncomfortable than being fake nice to snotty restaurant-goers barely containing their annoying kids. Do you consider waiting tables exploitation?
Then there's no need for the exchange of money.No. I think people who were denied their natural urges can find solace with such accommodations and who's to say there are not people out there who enjoy providing and receiving such services?
I think you'll find that a very arrogant belief if you came across any who saw it as their right to do whatever they wanted with their body or their lives and where such was just as much a transaction as so many others are. I can't believe any thinking person would take your position even though many of us wouldn't do such or advocate it. But I do believe in freedom of expression and where any law to stop such would be an infringement of their basic rights. How could you argue otherwise - apart from seeing sex as some sanctified activity. Try looking at our history and our related species (the bonobo) - and just discount any religious aspects.It's not there choice if I have to pay for them to pretend they want it.