paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Are they 100% accurate?
How much accurate in percentages?
How much accurate in percentages?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are they 100% accurate?
How much accurate in percentages?
Are they 100% accurate?
How much accurate in percentages?
religion's approach of just making stuff up.
If you've ever read a hard science on in detail, you'll know that they say.Are they 100% accurate?
How much accurate in percentages?
...it's not only the religious make stuff up
Scandals in Social Psychology Spreading - Ideas Market - WSJ
Are they 100% accurate?
How much accurate in percentages?
Are they 100% accurate?
How much accurate in percentages?
Although such a number would be impossible to determine, generalities can be made. The peer-reviewed science presented in scientific journals, having followed established scientific methodology, is almost always accurate, however the conclusions may be argued. The peer-reviewed "science" in other journals, such as we find in creation science, not having followed accepted science methods, is usually worthless. For example, the International Journal for Creation Research. is a peer reviewing publication that only reviews papers favorable to creationism. Here's the headline for a story by CNET news.Are they 100% accurate?
How much accurate in percentages?
Are they 100% accurate?
How much accurate in percentages?
Please read from the following links:
1. ***How Accurate Is Scientific Testing?
***How Accurate Is Scientific Testing?
2. An Epidemic of False Claims
An Epidemic of False Claims: Scientific American
This from a pseudoscience.Please read from the following links:
1. ***How Accurate Is Scientific Testing?
***How Accurate Is Scientific Testing?
Even a poorly supported scientific claim based on the weakest of evidence is better than a claim based on the supernatural for which there is absolutely no evidence.
This from a pseudoscience."The assertions by proponents of orthomolecular psychiatry were rejected in 1973 by a panel of the American Psychiatric Association.[1][11][12] Orthomolecular psychiatry has subsequently found little support in mainstream psychiatry"The writer of the linked article is an orthomolecular psychologist
Source:Wikipedia
And that is your blind-faith, in my opinion.