Indigo said:I am bigoted against... fundamentalists
televangelism
Frubals to you Net Doc.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Indigo said:I am bigoted against... fundamentalists
televangelism
I think Indigo was talking about the "often intolerance to other views" part. I am defently not for intolerance. Should I be?fun·da·men·tal·ism
n.
- A usually religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those principles, and often by intolerance of other views and opposition to secularism.
- often Fundamentalism An organized, militant Evangelical movement originating in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th century in opposition to Protestant Liberalism and secularism, insisting on the inerrancy of Scripture.
- Adherence to the theology of this movement.
So, your solution is to fight prejudice with prejudice?IndigoChild said:Or, to put it more succinctly, I am prejudiced against anyone I percieve to be a detriment to humanity by their actions dragging humanity through wars, bigotry, televangelism, hatred, racism, close-mindedness, close-heartedness, and other things that keep humanity from evolving.
Kat
Ok, Netdoc, can you provide us with any examples? We're all curious to know what sort of language is being used against Christians that isn't used against anyone else.NetDoc said:Well, Cold Stone, I concur. I have pointed this out repeatedly but upon deaf ears. If I were to use language towards other beliefs that are used towards Christians and their beliefs I would be castigated no end.
This is hardly an example. Indigo Child is stating her personal opinion, as do you on many occasions from what I read here on RF. What do you feel should be done about someone stating their personal opinion here on a religious discussion board? If we all believed the same as you, there wouldn't be much point of a discussion now would there? We could just nod, and slap each other on the back.NetDoc said:But as Indigo Child so eloquently put it: As a fundamentalist, I am a detriment to society. Makes me feel real welcome. Nor do I expect anything to be done about it. You want examples? There ya go.
May I ask if you really are a fundamentalist, NetDoc? I am only going by the definition that Ryan2065 posted and I have to admit, I really did not know the exact definition of the term until now. If that is accurate then it just sounds like another way of expressing your personal beliefs. From the sounds of it, the only problem anyone could possibly have with that belief is the intolerance part which Ryan2065 already said.NetDoc said:Well,
Cold Stone, I concur. I have pointed this out repeatedly but upon deaf ears. If I were to use language towards other beliefs that are used towards Christians and their beliefs I would be castigated no end.
But as Indigo Child so eloquently put it: As a fundamentalist, I am a detriment to society. Makes me feel real welcome. Nor do I expect anything to be done about it. You want examples? There ya go.
This describes me to a "T". However, the "often" parts do not. When you paint with such a broad brush, you usually paint outside the line you intended. I have often brisled at the misuse of this term to label EXTREMISTS. Intloerance abounds, but it's not just a "fundamentalist" issue.Ryan said:A usually religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles,
Why on Earth do you say that? - what is more do you really believe that?NetDoc said:This describes me to a "T". However, the "often" parts do not. When you paint with such a broad brush, you usually paint outside the line you intended. I have often brisled at the misuse of this term to label EXTREMISTS. Intloerance abounds, but it's not just a "fundamentalist" issue.
So now we have at least two people saying this is a problem. I know of at least one moderator who sees it as well but has remained silent.
But what do I know? I am a detriment to society.
I thought that place was reserved for the ignorant who rant incoherently and paint with a broad brush.IndigoChild said:I'm bigoted against bigots, idiots, morons, asshats, fundamentalists, and racists. I find their resistance to change and their idiocy, their disrespect for life and for other people, and many other things about them morally repugnant. Racists and fundamentalists especially. Anyone who insists I'm going to some imaginary place in the bowels of the earth after I die just because I'm Pagan or bisexual or whatnot is a waste of oxygen.
NetDoc said:This describes me to a "T". However, the "often" parts do not. When you paint with such a broad brush, you usually paint outside the line you intended. I have often brisled at the misuse of this term to label EXTREMISTS. Intloerance abounds, but it's not just a "fundamentalist" issue.
So now we have at least two people saying this is a problem. I know of at least one moderator who sees it as well but has remained silent.
But what do I know? I am a detriment to society.
Before trying so hard to sound insightful you should first try to sound coherent. But, even before taking on that challenge, you should recognize that you've been asked to supply specific examples supporting your OP, and that evading this request speaks volumes.Cold-Stone said:It appears that there are a lot of emotion regarding this subject. I suspect many (not all) of you were forced by some legalistic means regarding some distorted view of biblical/Christian thinking. But in the "Market Place of Ideas," it seems that the major thrust among the pagan libs is tolerance. Don't offend people, don't judge people, be tolerant towards other peoples beliefs. And for the most part, this is carried out in relation to most systems EXCEPT Judeo Christian virues, concepts and ideas. Though it is true, the Bible is very Intolerant towards many things outside it's system. But as a representative of this system of thought, I would probably be friends with many of you pagans if we knew each other and probably would grab a hamburger with you. Despite disagreements. This intolerance and often hatred seems to still be imbedded upon some psychological nature that perhaps the aggressor is not even aware of. It just seems extremely hypocritical as a fundalmentalist Christian hater to be tolerant towards the other systems EXCEPT this one. These factors are worth exploring in your individual lives. Cold-Stone Advantage
If I see anyone around who is hostile to another's thinking, I try to gently remind them to be tolerant. Unfortunately, I have a horrible double-standard when it comes to people from my own religion. I become incensed, perhaps because I feel that (since most of us pagans have known intolerance ourselves) we should be more understanding. I guess I'd have to ask which pagans you are referring to, because I am not aware of them.Cold-Stone said:Now I am not religious at all. But I am curious as to why so many pagans on here are so hostile to Christian thinking.
Not for me. I think all systems should be open to questioning, especially my own. It's true that I don't like to criticize, but that's more because I don't feel it within my place to judge another belief system unless they're hurting others.Cold-Stone said:It seems that all other systems are restricted from criticism in many of your minds lest you are a bigot.
I can criticize them. I just don't see the point. Why bother trying to erode another's belief system? The same goes true for my attitude for Christianity.Cold-Stone said:Islam-can't criticise Islam, or you are a racist
Judaism-can't criticise judaism, or you are an anti-semite
can't criticise buddhism, or you are narrow minded.
I'm not sure if labelling all pagans 'liberal', or 'goofy minded' is a healthy argument. I happen to be both, and proud of it, but labelling others (especially when you are attempting to critisize their 'bigot' behavior) rather ruins the point.Cold-Stone said:These are the elementary type school proposals from many liberal pagan goofy minded people.
(I honestly don't know if you mean 'forced' as in 'to go to church', or as in being raped. I think you probably mean well, so I will assume the former.) As a young lady, I wasn't forced to go to church. I enjoyed going, and still do if a friend invites me along. Christianity, like I percieve all religions (and non-religions) as having, has great wisdom to teach other faiths.Cold-Stone said:And since many are on here, what is the real issue? Were you "forced" by your parents as young lads? Are you just always in a bad mood?
Okay, you grouped pagans and liberals already, so why compound the situation by suggesting that gays are in the same field?Cold-Stone said:Why can't you pagans and liberals and gays just be more considerate towards another worldview?
You're right. It is. Or, at least, it would be if it were true. Please consider that you might be thinking of pre-emptive bigotry. That's where you assume someone's going to reply to you in a negative manner, and you start generalizing and maligning the other group as a self-defenseCold-Stone said:It's extremely narrow minded.
Oh, no!NetDoc said:Michel,
Indigo Child told us that people like me (which includes me) are a "detriment to society". I have since made it a part of my Title.
Most things we do are driven by unconcsious motives that most people are not aware of, the underlying force being survival, or basically self interest. No matter what side of the tracks, people are driven by this motive.Cold-Stone said:This intolerance and often hatred seems to still be imbedded upon some psychological nature that perhaps the aggressor is not even aware of.
Maize said:Actually, I don't think the Pagans on here are hostile to Christianity, I think it's just you. Most of the time, Christians, Pagans, Buddhists, Muslims, UUs, Atheists, Jews, Seekers, and everyone else gets along just fine. No, we don't always agree on everything, but there's no hostility between us. Most of the time this is a very peaceful forum.
Ulver said:Too bad that doesn't quite work out that way in real life.
FeathersinHair said:True. I do consider RF 'real life,' though.
I'm not going to lie and say it never happens (though I wish it didn't) but I feel that saying all pagans are anti- Christian is not kind to those who aren't.
Well said, and very true! (And I apologize; I should have known that you knew what Maize was referring to!)Ulver said:oh I knew what Maize was getting at and I certainly am not stating that all pagans are "anti-christian". That would be just dumb of me to do.
I just felt it's odd in a sad, yet funny way that people here for the most part get along while in the world we live in there is relgious violence almost daily. From the whole problem in Palestine/Israel to the Buddha statues in Afghanistan being destroyed (never mind the far worse things in decades to centuries before in the name of so many different religions).
np: Earth- Raiford (The Felon Wind)