Kangaroo Feathers
Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Owners of Noah’s Ark replica sue insurers for ‘rain damage’
Good thing irony and schadenfreude aren't fattening.
Good thing irony and schadenfreude aren't fattening.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Beat me to it.Owners of Noah’s Ark replica sue insurers for ‘rain damage’
Good thing irony and schadenfreude aren't fattening.
Beat me to it.
God, that is so funny.
I can just picture Ken Ham walking around inside with an umbrella pointing at the leaks and raging up a storm himself.
Mods feel free to collapse
Duplicate topic posted in the same wrong section TWICE in one day.
What does a lawsuit have to do with Evolution vs Creation?
Learn to post in the correct forums.
Take it to current events.
It doesn't matter either way, I just can't stop laughing. =OD
I'm more privy for the stories and jokes area myself.Duplicate topic posted in the same wrong section TWICE in one day.
What does a lawsuit have to do with Evolution vs Creation?
Learn to post in the correct forums.
Take it to current events.
I don't know of any believers in the Noah's Ark myth that are not creationists. It is sort of a package deal.
I see that the ability to reason has abandoned you once again. Creationism and Ark belief are two peas in a pod. This thread is about Ark believers. Your face palming privileges need to be revoked.That has nothing to do with a lawsuit between the owner of the park and insurance companies.
I see that the ability to reason has abandoned you once again. Creationism and Ark belief are two peas in a pod. This thread is about Ark believers. Your face palming privileges need to be revoked.
Doesn't matter if the park has the Ark in it. The religious connection has nothing to do with the lawsuit. Nor does it have a connection to evolution.
No, he's right. If the ark itself had been damaged by rain, that'd be funny.I see that the ability to reason has abandoned you once again. Creationism and Ark belief are two peas in a pod. This thread is about Ark believers. Your face palming privileges need to be revoked.
That you can't follow a conversation is not surprising to me. Once again, this thread is about Ark believers. You asked a question. It was answered for you. An inability to understand a simple explanation is no excuse to use a face palm. But you are amusing.
No, he's right. If the ark itself had been damaged by rain, that'd be funny.
But a road was damaged. So this thread is nothing but.....
"Something bad happened to creationists. Ha ha!"
It has nothing to do with creationism.Still if would a best fit is in the creationism section. It is hardly "current events". Outside of the fact that they are creationists this story has no punch.
Except or the fact that the main protagonist is one of the most famous (infamous?) creationists in the land. If this was not a creationist story it would be of no note. Tell me where would you post it?It has nothing to do with creationism.
And as a current event, a dispute with insurers is snoozeworthy.
Clearly, we need a Schadenfreude Only forum.
I wouldn't.Except or the fact that the main protagonist is one of the most famous (infamous?) creationists in the land. If this was not a creationist story it would be of no note. Tell me where would you post it?