mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Now what if that "or" is too simple and it is in effect the fallacy of the excluded middle?
The problem of P or non-P is that not all cases of P are the same and indeed not all cases of the verb "be"
So here it is a test as we all love those.
You are now observing 3 humans for 2 different cases of P including the claim of knowledge and the 3rd opition in play reductio ad absurdum.
Physicalist: I know that the universe is physical and not something else.
Non-physicalist: I know that the universe is from God in a non-physical sense and not something else.
Me: I don't know any of that and in fact since I violate the objective absolute universal status of what ever objective reality is in itself, I am now dead/going to Hell, because it really can't be done differently than those 2 versions.
So for the set of all posters believing in any version of these 2, what they are reading is not really real for really real.
The problem of P or non-P is that not all cases of P are the same and indeed not all cases of the verb "be"
So here it is a test as we all love those.
You are now observing 3 humans for 2 different cases of P including the claim of knowledge and the 3rd opition in play reductio ad absurdum.
Physicalist: I know that the universe is physical and not something else.
Non-physicalist: I know that the universe is from God in a non-physical sense and not something else.
Me: I don't know any of that and in fact since I violate the objective absolute universal status of what ever objective reality is in itself, I am now dead/going to Hell, because it really can't be done differently than those 2 versions.
So for the set of all posters believing in any version of these 2, what they are reading is not really real for really real.
