Parts of The Bible are most definitely in contradiction to scientific findings. I didn't really think this point was what you were going after because it is just so indefensible. So completely indefensible that it is laughable. I thought you were trying to state that The Bible contains some sound information from a scientific perspective - not that the entire thing is without contradiction to scientific findings.
Holy crap - here's a super-duper easy one - if you understand the science (if you don't now, then go read up and come back to me once you have), then this one blows your stance completely out of the water.
The Bible says: "God made the first man (Adam) out of clay." - that is, literally, that the first human was made from clay. Now, I get that we are all put together from the same stuff that exists on Earth - not all of it can be found in "clay", specifically, of course - but I am sure that is where your feeble attempts to defend The Bible's idiotic account would go. I get that entirely. But what I would like you to take into consideration is the striking, and rationally undeniable evidence for common descent (that is, humans as a product of the evolution of other ape species) that comes in the form of the study of endogenous retroviruses (this is the key thing you need to read up on if you currently have no knowledge or exposure - which is why I bolded, italicized, and underlined it for you, for your convenience) as they appear in mass-commonality within the DNA of both other ape species and humans. Where does the fact that human and ape lineage converge somewhere down the line play into the idea that "God created the first human from clay?" How do you reconcile this? Wouldn't it be somewhat more accurate to say that He created the first "ape" from this earthen substance? Hell... I mean it makes more sense not to use the specific word "clay" in the first place, of course, since it is not encompassing of enough of the actual materials used to grow and become a human body... but we're talking about The Bible, of course - which means we have to give it some leeway, as it was written by a bunch of ancient people who were ignorant of many of the facts surrounding their own existence and state of being. It would also then make more sense to say that He created the first [insert original ancestor of apes and humans here] out of "clay," but, of course, we couldn't expect that knowledge to be part of thousands of years old peoples either.
And I will tell you exactly why the animosity from my end. Because your type of mindset sickens me. That's why. It is the bane of humanity, in my opinion, and I personally can't do enough to combat it. Stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.