I reject everything the religions and their various prophets and messengers have said about gods and an afterlife, which is clearly of human origin and comprises only guesses.
You're taking this too personally. You see the atheist's rejection of your beliefs and are offended. That's on you. You're responsible for controlling your emotions and their expression.
Why do the atheists, indifferent to the divine matters, love to argue with Christians about God?
I don't think atheists argue about gods. I don't. Atheists just tell you why they reject the claims.
Regarding your god, the one you call God, the god of the Christian Bible, I've already ruled out the possibility of its existence two different ways, so there is nothing to discuss there, and I don't care if you believe in it or not, so I have no incentive to try to talk you out of your belief. It's not about gods. For me, it's more about theists and their religions. It's more about belief by faith and why that can never be a path to truth. But not gods. Nor angels. Nor demons. Nor sin. Nor redemption. Those are theological matters of no interest to the unbeliever.
Perhaps you should ask yourself why you keep starting threads that beg for a rebuttal in a place skeptics come if you don't want to see dissent, and you deliberately make them provocative by making grand claims for your intellectual prowess, by presenting incoherent ideas and calling them proofs, and expressing your contempt for atheist, and then bemoan the inevitable result. Of course you'll get a reaction.
If you don't want a rebuttal from a skeptic, post your opinions in DIRs, or simply state your beliefs in open threads like this one, that you can't defend them but believe them anyway as many other believers do, and without taking gratuitous shots at atheists. Who's going to argue with that? It's militant theists on a mission to confront atheists or evolution in thread after thread like some kind of crusader who get the blow back.
Sell your religion without demeaning the alternatives if you can as those alternatives (critical thinking, science, secular humanism) promote themselves without a mention of religion. If you can, tell us why faith is a virtue without using the words materialism, myopic, or scientism. If you can, explain why creationism is correct without reference to evolution just as science argues for the correctness of evolution without a mention of creationism. If you can, explain why Christianity is a good thing without a reference to what you consider the moral and intellectual failings of atheism just as skeptics sing the praises of secular humanism without any reference to gods or holy books.
