I accept the theory of evolution as you've defined it, I've seen in my lifetime new species of dogs arise, for example. Next, try asking the forum geniuses here whether dogs can give birth to cats, and they'll give you double-speak about well defined clades that are "good" and "unlikely" to change, meaning, they agree, dogs can become new species of dogs but NEVER cats or birds or fish... just like the Bible says. The Bible is compatible with modern science.
Do you believe that humans and african apes share a common ancestor together, which existed prior to humans or african apes? Do you believe that all animal life that exists on the planet evolved from simpler life forms which originally lived in the ocean? Do you believe that all animals are related to each other, and they all share a common ancestor at some point in history? Do you accept the following diagram of how evolution looks, which shows how we are all related to each other, that primates which includes us, shared a common ancestor?
If you answer no, that you disagree that apes and humans share a common ancestor, then you are not accepting the science for non-scientific reasons. You are distorting what the science shows in order to pay lip service that you are not "rejecting evolution", while you are in fact denying and rejecting it.
BTW, the theory of evolution absolutely does not suggest that cats give birth to dogs, or that humans came from monkeys. That is not possible. That is not what the evidence shows. But it does show that at some point, way back, those branches of evolution were connected. Cats and dogs, humans and monkeys, at some point all shared a common ancestor, some small rodent creature that survived the dinosaur extinction.
Do you accept any of this? If not, then can you please answer my questions why you seem to feel a need to deny the science in order to believe in God, while other Christians do not? I fully accept the above, and I believe in God. Do you?