King Phenomenon
Well-Known Member
Forgiving someone while supporting the justice system. Believing abortion is wrong while supporting a woman's right to choose. Any others? Is one two faced?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Forgiving someone while supporting the justice system. Believing abortion is wrong while supporting a woman's right to choose. Any others? Is one two faced?
So I guess someone else has the right to put a criminal in prison as well.I think it's possible to support a woman's right to choose while believing abortion is wrong. It isn't necessarily contradictory or two-faced. One can believe that smoking and drinking are wrong, but wouldn't interfere with someone else's choice to do that.
Forgiving someone while supporting the justice system. Believing abortion is wrong while supporting a woman's right to choose. Any others? Is one two faced?
I don't. Maybe I should've put a ? after the title. However, I guess I did leave it open with the sentence; Two faced?Those examples don't seem contradictory to me at all...
*Shrugs*
How do you figure they are?
Forgiving someone while supporting the justice system. Believing abortion is wrong while supporting a woman's right to choose. Any others? Is one two faced?
So I guess someone else has the right to put a criminal in prison as well.
I was talking about the courtsWell, not just anybody. They have to go through due process and get their day in court.
I disagree with most abortion, but support the right of women to choose. I don't see that as contradictory or two-faced.Forgiving someone while supporting the justice system. Believing abortion is wrong while supporting a woman's right to choose. Any others? Is one two faced?
A person can be forgiven by others and still receive the distribution of the justice system of they are found guilty of a crime.Forgiving someone while supporting the justice system. Believing abortion is wrong while supporting a woman's right to choose. Any others? Is one two faced?
I was talking about the courts
We might be heading into 3 or possibly even 4 face territory at this point.Yes, under the current system. Although it seems that our court system may be a bit screwed up. Maybe they're just overwhelmed, overworked, and understaffed.
I would also imagine there's some degree of corruption, as is the case with any governmental agency. That's the likely reason for anything that might seem contradictory or two-faced.
I don't. Maybe I should've put a ? after the title. However, I guess I did leave it open with the sentence; Two faced?
Neither of those is logically contradictory. Individual forgiveness does not mean that we must ignore the necessary social consequence of criminal behavior. And personally believing that abortion is wrong does not logically require that we wish to force our beliefs on everyone else.Forgiving someone while supporting the justice system. Believing abortion is wrong while supporting a woman's right to choose. Any others? Is one two faced?
Forgiving someone while supporting the justice system. Believing abortion is wrong while supporting a woman's right to choose. Any others? Is one two faced?
Well, there's always ...Forgiving someone while supporting the justice system. Believing abortion is wrong while supporting a woman's right to choose. Any others? Is one two faced?
I don’t see any of them as contradictory. Nuanced perhaps.Forgiving someone while supporting the justice system. Believing abortion is wrong while supporting a woman's right to choose. Any others? Is one two faced?
Before or after makes no differenceWhen should someone be held responsible, before or after the fact?
Certainly it does. A person who is responsible before the act, and not having performed the act, should not have to face the consequences of the person who performed the act..Before or after makes no difference