Elipticalvoyage
Member
I would ask all readers to consider this proverb beforereading my imperative: Matthew 3:17
And a voice from heaven said, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased."
(after the act).
This proverb insinuates that god and jesus are two separate entities; Each with their own consciousness with deeds committed by separate minds; hence the ability for the son of god to please his father, the heavenly god in heaven.
And the thought:
If one person could be murdered in the interest of the crowd; Then shouldnt the worth of that one persons life be equal in value to the sum of the crowd? subjectively? Wait .
And consider this before answering:
If that one persons life is subjectively worth as much as the crowd; then in gods eyes would it not be an act of injustice to destroy one, in the interest of the other(s)? Wait .
Considering a final thought:
If this has really happened to jesus in the bible, then does he really deserve the throne? Because if he was murdered, then he is not worth the value to god of the crowd! Wait
PS. Answer the question directly. Do not reply to this thread with anything but logic ,by which I mean opinion/theories and dogma. I am, looking for a logically based answer that concurs with the truth of this word (S). Wait
Last thought: do not answer me with dogma. A proverb that contradicts this, conversely, would be ok.
And a voice from heaven said, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased."
(after the act).
This proverb insinuates that god and jesus are two separate entities; Each with their own consciousness with deeds committed by separate minds; hence the ability for the son of god to please his father, the heavenly god in heaven.
And the thought:
If one person could be murdered in the interest of the crowd; Then shouldnt the worth of that one persons life be equal in value to the sum of the crowd? subjectively? Wait .
And consider this before answering:
If that one persons life is subjectively worth as much as the crowd; then in gods eyes would it not be an act of injustice to destroy one, in the interest of the other(s)? Wait .
Considering a final thought:
If this has really happened to jesus in the bible, then does he really deserve the throne? Because if he was murdered, then he is not worth the value to god of the crowd! Wait
PS. Answer the question directly. Do not reply to this thread with anything but logic ,by which I mean opinion/theories and dogma. I am, looking for a logically based answer that concurs with the truth of this word (S). Wait
Last thought: do not answer me with dogma. A proverb that contradicts this, conversely, would be ok.