You're arguing that pregnant people should be denied rights we even grant to corpses. This seems pretty hateful to me. My question stands.Yes, this is a great example of how fake news starts.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You're arguing that pregnant people should be denied rights we even grant to corpses. This seems pretty hateful to me. My question stands.Yes, this is a great example of how fake news starts.
But Ken, you can't imagine that parents don't automatically become saint-like on becoming a parent...but you know what, they don't necessarily. There are some bad, bad parents out there, and a girl's life might just be safer in the hands of the court than in the hands of those very bad parents when something like a pregnancy rears its ugly head.You probably would have denied the holocaust when it was first being reported . But I understand why... you can't imagine that people would actually stoop so low... but they do.
And there are thousands of unwanted children who would love to be adopted...and aren't.That would be a great idea. There are thousands who can't have babies who would love to adopt them.
Exception to the rule: The law provides an exception, however, so that a minor who objects to the consent requirement or whose parent, guardian, or custodian refuses to consent may petition a juvenile court for a waiver of the consent requirement.
- Known as a judicial bypass, this procedure permits the minor to obtain an abortion without parental consent if the court finds either that she is mature enough to make the abortion decision independently or that an abortion is in her best interests.
But Ken, you can't imagine that parents don't automatically become saint-like on becoming a parent...but you know what, they don't necessarily. There are some bad, bad parents out there, and a girl's life might just be safer in the hands of the court than in the hands of those very bad parents when something like a pregnancy rears its ugly head.
And there are thousands of unwanted children who would love to be adopted...and aren't.
So if it were up to you, you would force children to give birth? Yuck.That would be a great idea. There are thousands who can't have babies who would love to adopt them.
So if it were up to you, you would force children to give birth? Yuck.
Yes, but only in a loving way...So if it were up to you, you would force children to give birth? Yuck.
LOL No, Planned Parenthood doesn't prostitute children nor do they sell "baby parts" as a number of investigations have found.So, if it were up to you, you would let Planned Parenthood continue the prostitution of the "children"?????? YUCK! Along with the selling of baby parts? YUCK! YUCK!!
That's because you changed what we are talking about. We are talking about PARENTAL CONSENT. Nice moving of goal posts.LOL No, Planned Parenthood doesn't prostitute children nor do they sell "baby parts" as a number of investigations have found.
If it were up to me, people would be free to make their own decisions about their own bodies.
Way to avoid the question though. Good job!
Uh, yeah, I know. My question was about forcing children to have children, as you seemed to indicate would be your preference.That's because you changed what we are talking about. We are talking about PARENTAL CONSENT. Nice moving of goal posts.
Court proceedings and several investigations (including Congressional investigations) have already cleared them of the things you claim about them.And, yes, Planned Parenthood FACILITATES the prostitution and videos show they do sell "baby parts" as it is also being admitted in the court proceedings that are currently being held in California.
Though the courts are not perfect they tend to have a better record than parents do when it comes to matters such as this. Like it or not when a child is old enough to have sex (whether your approve or not) they are old enough to have a degree of privacy when it comes to their own body. A parent has to let go sooner or later. Like it or not this is a case of "sooner".Your quote just supports my position...
"the Court" decides if she is mature enough???? Since when does a "Court" decide if she is mature enough to have an abortion? Is any youth (male or female) mature enough to produce a baby that they can't support, have no financial capacity to rear etc have any demonstration of being "mature enough"? A "mature enough" boy and girl would have used contraceptives on both bodies. (Now, that is just good old common sense.
Best interest? What does that mean? What is "best interest"?
Uh, yeah, I know. My question was about forcing children to have children, as you seemed to indicate would be your preference.
Court proceedings and several investigations (including Congressional investigations) have already cleared them of the things you claim about them.
"Children's" privacy should be later and not sooner unless you don't have a problem with sex-trafficking.Though the courts are not perfect they tend to have a better record than parents do when it comes to matters such as this. Like it or not when a child is old enough to have sex (whether your approve or not) they are old enough to have a degree of privacy when it comes to their own body. A parent has to let go sooner or later. Like it or not this is a case of "sooner".
Your quote just supports my position...
As myself and several others have pointed out, such claims have long ago been debunked.Uh, yeah, I know. My question was about you permitting the facilitation of ongoing prostitution of children and the selling of body parts by Planned Parenthood
Several now CLOSED investigations prove you wrong. Sorry.Not really... it's ongoing.
Why?"Children's" privacy should be later and not sooner unless you don't have a problem with sex-trafficking.
So what are your thoughts about such socialist impositions as child labor laws, compulsory education and age of consent regulations?It's the Socialist Democrats garnering even more control over people's lives to the point where a parents own children are not exempt.
I think it all started getting implemented shortly after Hillary Clinton's , "It takes a village to raise a child" which started the inquisition to remove parenthood from the home, and place it directly into the hands of the socialist state.