I would very much like more information why you think that comparison is bad? Claiming that mystics' experiences of the risen Christ is considered credible evidence of some factual event, has to be considered with the fact that mystics of other cultures likewise experience their own respective deity forms. These sorts of experiences, while valid mystically, are not valid when cited as supporting evidence to bolster confused claims of historical facts.I'm going by what I know. Your comparison is really bad, actually. If you would like more information as to why that comparison is bad, just ask.
Unless you had some other point you were trying to make that I was missing?