ProudMuslim
Active Member
This is a very weak argument. I don't see why it would have anything to to do with Krishna and Buddha.
It is only weak because you dont have anything to say about it. The fact is Mr. Smart, The Bible speak about nations and humans from the start of the creation. Don't ever try to even compare the Qur'an with the Bible in that perspective. We don't claim all the stories related to human beings since the start of the universe is mentioned in our holy book.
Also the Buddha, or Siddhārtha Gautama flourished in the late 6th century and early 5th century BCE, a historical and legendary figure...more real than I can say about Abraham, Ishmael and Issac...so what could be possible daft reason would Moses even know of the Buddha?
The bible speaks about creation from the start, so why not include great prophets of other nations (if they were indeed prophets)?
Why would you think that Moses possible know what go on in India?
Just like he (PBUH) knew everything about creation since Adam! Isn't that what Genesis is about.
Of course, the Hebrew and Christian scriptures would ignore other religious figures around the world, but doesn't mean they don't exist in other cultures. The vast distance of geographical locations would have prevented people knowing each other religions.
Please look at the above reply.
Do you think that Moses' Exodus took him all the way to India?
No, but very absurd question.
I know that your prophet and Muslims like to exaggerate, but your illogic is quite staggering.
You don't know prophet Muhammed, your sickness with Islam is your personal issue so deal with it.
The Buddha or Siddhārtha Gautama, lived about a thousand years before Muhammad, and yet he wrote nothing of him.
I'm sure your christian background pushes you to defend your forefathers belief and try to attach every stupid thing about it to Islam in the name of "Abrahamic faith". Islam focused on the prophets descended from Abraham (PBUH) but did not eliminate the idea that other messengers and prophets were sent to nation throughout history.
Do Muhammad write of anything about the Buddha?
Nope, but we don't have anything about Prophet Daniel, Samuel and many others that are mentioned in the Bible itself. But i need to remind you again that Qur'an mentioned specific prophets/messengers but didn't say those mentioned ones are the only ones. Do you get it, or still confused?
If Muhammad didn't write anything of either religious figure, why would Moses?
LOL, let's just say that Bible is almost 5 times bigger than the Qur'an and it includes stories of nations and names of prophets that are not mentioned at all in the Qur'an which suffice with the notion that YES other prophets and messengers were sent to nations throughout history but didn't start naming them.
You're quite daft.
And you live in a pathetic confusing state of mind.
Bahá'u'lláh lived in the 19th century. The earliest Islamic empire to conquer India was in late Middle Ages. During the centuries they have been in India, they would have known the Hindu and Buddhist religions by then. By Bahá'u'lláh's time, he would have these non-Islamic religious figures been well-known to the Bahá'í.
So? He could have not listed them as prophets and follow the footpaths previous religions, right?
And why is Ishmael (PBUH) is also a prophet to Bahai's? Why didn't they go with the Judeo-Christian scriptures and deny his prophethood?
What does the Bahá'í Faith have anything to do with Ishmael being a prophet?
Don't they believe in the prophethood of Ishmael as well?
Tell me, Proud Muslim.
Would Muhammad know of any the Mayan deities of his time?
Or do you think the Olmec or Mayan civilisation would know about Ishmael or Muhammad?
Your introduction of the Bahá'í Faith into the whole debate about Ishmael has nothing to do with the thread, except perhaps trying to sidetrack me.
Are you trying to sidetrack me? Are you trying to divert me from the current thread?
Are you going to complain and whine about sidetracking you everytime you cannot have the answers to my questions which are related to this lame topic.
Well, the Qur'an do have the verse, where men are stronger, hence he is the master, so she must obey him.
No where in the Qur'an that says because a man is a stronger therefore he is a master. You are in serious state of confusion.You need to remove Judeo-Christian scriptures from your head when you want to talk about Islam.
Islam gave more responsibilities to the man and only if he perform them all, he will be have the right to lead his home, if he doesn't then he cannot become the leader. The woman is not required to carry many responsibilities. But when it comes to commandments and punishments, they are equal for both the men and women.
What kind of a master will have equal punishment to his slave? Again i think this whole Master vs Slave scenario is derived from the Judeo-Christian scripures and not from the Quran, see the below for more information.
Do you want me to say Judaism and Christianity are misogynist and sexist religions?
Ok, they (Judaism and Christianity) are misogynist and sexist religions, just like Islam. I have no problem thinking that many of teachings and customs are stupidly archaic.
Wrong Islam is nothing like Judeo-Christian teachings that dictate:
- it was Eve fault that lead us human to be cursed and kicked out from heaven
- that woman is filthier than men so when she give birth to a girl she is considered impure for double the period of that given to a woman who give birth to a boy
- that a woman even if she was single and slept with a married man should face stonning to death but if a single man slept with a married woman he will not face death
- that raped woman must marry her rapist
- that women dont inherit (sisters, mothers cant inherit; daughters can inherit if their parents dont have sons)
- that widow women must marry their husband's brothers to keep the family name
- that women cannot initiate divorce
- that women scarf is a sign of her subjugation to men
Judaism is a stupid religion. And so is Christianity. Does that make you feel better?
I don't give a damn about your stance on Judaism or Christianity or even Islam. I know you have weird fixation on Islam but again that is your personal issue. However, i am interested in getting your facts straight about Islam when you spout ridiculous accusations.
Do you want me to show respect for religions that I know are stupid, archaic and misogynist?
Nope, i don't have respect either for such beliefs. Just like i dont have respect for any system or movement that works on eliminating the natural difference between a woman and a man.
Muslims have been making lame interpretations of their own Qur'an in regards to the so-called scientific miracle in that modern science prove the Qur'an. And if I called it stupid, because there are no better words to describe their attempts of twisting the context of sacred book to make it seem "scientific", is nothing more than propaganda. Do you want me to respect such claims as being valid?
Do you want me to respect your and other athiests lame *** response to Muslims claims as being valid?
We are already going in circle.
Last edited: