it's the perfect comparison then.Then just as he can't complain if he's harassed, since that's what he wanted to happen, so Jesus can't complain (and didn't) about getting killed, which is what he wanted to happen.
Walruff was not a victim but a volunteer to be harassed and can't complain about being harassed. Jesus was not a victim ─ he was a volunteer to be killed and can't complain about being killed.
Neither was a victim. Victims don't get what they want. Walruff and Jesus got what they wanted,.
Jesus was as much a victim as Walraff was.
Blaming Walraff for the racism he was the victim of... is absurd.
As a matter of fact - Walraff made a great contribution to Germany exposing the racism among its residents. He posted the video and got rewarded I think.
Jesus also helped mankind with his wonderful work. He is my savior!
that was all perfectly fine - I mean the things mentioned in the Bible as opposed to tales.He abused his mother, contrary to the Commandment. He assaulted businessmen in the Temple who were going about their lawful business in a traditional trade in the traditional manner. He also overthrew their tables and scattered their money, occasioning them loss. He made no attempt to persuade them to his point of view, he just charged in. He used someone else's pigs to perform magic regarding devils, and killed all the pigs, with no mention of compensation. He also killed a fig tree in a fit of pique, and either the tree had an owner who also went uncompensated, or it was a wild tree whose fruit fed the public, thus depriving them of a resource.
And no doubt I could find more if I put my mind to it. (A long time ago in Mexico I came across the legends of il malo Santo Christo, which if you don't know them, are tales of Jesus' childhood of the sort where the infant Jesus goes around killing, wounding and working destruction and his mother has to follow after, putting everything right again.)