fantôme profane;1868311 said:
So what is the definition of charity?
How does giving money to a neo-nazi organization help anybody?
It helps the members of their group which would make it charity. You have given funds to a group which would rely on donations to keep going...That is pretty much textbook charity.
It doesnt help society, it doesnt even help those people in that organization. The people in such an organization would be much better of if it closed its doors.
So something is only charitable if it helps society? What if I donate one of my paychecks every month to a family who would lose everything if I didn't; would that not be a form of charity?
I don't see how you're going to argue that it isn't helping an organization when you give them funds. It's money they can use for whatever they want.
As for your last point there: That's your perspective. I'm sure the Neo-Nazi's would disagree.
If I give money to a church that uses that money to help people (and this is usually the case) then I am giving charity. If I am giving money to a church that does not help people that is not charity.
I don't get it... Giving money to an organization that relies on donations isn't charity unless they use that money for other people who rely on charity.
My point is that it doesn't matter who gets the money; if you donate money, time, or resources to a group, organization, or individual, you are providing charity. Whether it's UNICEF or a Neo-Nazi organization is completely irrelevant to what is defined as charity. You could certainly argue one of those is more noble charity-wise, but both are dictionarily 'charity'.