No, it can't be. I agree that the laws cannot apply to the evident God Brahman but they do apply to IT'S/HIS/HER nature. It is the nature of Brahman to evolve and transform and form and dismantle what was formed. It has an orderly nature.
Just like we have a biology.
People keep talking about "nature" but they forget that NATURE is not something stand-alone. (athiests)
Nor is it right to say there is this being and then it created "nature" (thiests ex-nihilo)
It is neither, The nature is intrinsic to Being.
It is Brahman's nature. That said god's nature, who transcends that nature. Laws are for ITS nature.
Like we say about humans -- temperament, aptitude, tendency and nature.
XYZ has a very helpful nature.
It is ABC's natural tendency to __________.
The observable nature is Brahman's nature - or the said god's nature in the OP.
Not just "nature" in vacuum without association, possessive noun.