I'll bet he was glad to get off that boat!My paternal grandfather, when he served in the navy in WW1, was on a boat with man who never took a bath, because he said it weakened your back.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'll bet he was glad to get off that boat!My paternal grandfather, when he served in the navy in WW1, was on a boat with man who never took a bath, because he said it weakened your back.
Yeah. It was a "trawler". The navy used them for all sorts of purposes. But I don't think he saw much action , thank goodness. He was lucky to go in the navy. Educated guys like him in the army got promoted to be officers and mostly died leading their men out of the trenches. Pointless waste. My maternal grandfather tried to sign up in the army, but was under-age and got sussed. Which no doubt is why I am here.......I'll bet he was glad to get off that boat!
And I suppose if a computer model WERE released, you'd accept it? Oh, and buildings collapse as a result of fire all the time.Another year gone and the 9/11 debunkers always get a free-pass:
The people who think 9/11 may have been an 'inside job'
Why is it when anyone questions that something that has never happened before can so easily be explained by the simple statement, "Subsequent investigations made it clear that the tower structures were weakened by the inferno from the planes and felled by the weight of collapsing floors."
This is pure fabricated fantasy. No computer model was ever released by NIST showing how they came to the conclusions on how the towers fell. Building 7 explanation is complete hand waving. And no building ever before or since has collapse as result of fire. If it were possibly true terrorists would be using fire to take down buildings everywhere around the world. There is no scientific explanation for how the buildings collapsed on 9/11. The official story is the real conspiracy theory.
All you have to do is say, "made it clear" and debate ends.
"But they'll welcome us as liberators!"Pretty obvious why you didn't gain the hearts and minds. Most people dislike being invaded.
True enough."But they'll welcome us as liberators!"
Seriously, though, the real problems really came about during the occupation, and as a direct result of "de-Baathification" rather than the invasion itself.
Also blackballing anyone with Baathist ties from pretty much any employment. That was a big thing. Tribal Republicans like to joke about it "oh, boo hoo, poor widdle terrorists became terrorists because of unemployment?" Turns out, actually, yeah, people DO become radicalised when, on top of destroying their country, you destroy any self respect they may have had as a provider in a highly patriarchal society, not to mention killing family and friends.True enough.
There were some truly cack-handed incidents, my favourite being the attempt to replace the national flag (red, black, green and white, like those of many Arab countries, beloved by football fans etc and which predated Saddam) with........ a blue, white and yellow one! Now, er, who is it in the Middle East that has a blue and white flag?...........