Interesting. I'll check that out in the Septuagint to see if it really calls Dinah that afterwards. However, in that case you cannot have an issue with the gospel of Matthew(because in the oldest version it uses the same word parthenos). The English translations do not really matter when it comes to this kind of research. They are only translations.
Well quote the verse because I'm not even sure what scriptures you are saying are so clear about this.
It's only spiritual seed that is counted because God called Isaac Abraham's only son. (Genesis 22:2) So, Ishmael did not count; even though he is biologically the firstborn of Abraham.
You're taking it too literally when I say adopted I mean as in because He had no human father. So Joseph acted as His father. It was not that God disowned anyone. Before we go further on these questions let me ask you if you've ever read the gospels and if so which?
I can certainly take issue with Matthew for many reasons, and I do. Furthermore if you accept that Matthew doesn’t say that Mary was a virgin then the entire theology of the Virgin Birth loses it foundation. That is a tenet held by the vast majority of Christians.
I can cite verses as needed but you should be more specific on which ones you need. First it is generally accepted by Christians that the messiah shall be a descendant of David. But more specifically scripture says that he must be a physical, not “spiritual”, descendant of David. Among the scriptures that show this is I Chronicles 17. Verses 11-12 read, “And it shall come to pass, when thy days be expired that thou must go
to be with thy fathers, that I will raise up thy seed after thee, which shall be of thy sons; and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build me an house, and I will stablish his throne for ever.” The Hebrew word in that verse is “zera” (see Strong’s 2233). This word
always means physical descendants and never spiritual ones. (That would usually be the Hebrew word “ben”)
By the way, because the word “zera” means physical offspring, that is one of the reasons the servant of Isaiah 53 could not be Jesus. In Isaiah 53 it says, “Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put
him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see
his seed, he shall prolong
his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand.” The word used is seed (“zera”). The servant of Isaiah 53 will have physical offspring,
not “spiritual” offspring. Jesus never had physical offspring. So he can not be the servant of Isaiah 53.
You ask if I have ever read the gospels. I have read them many times as well as the rest of the Christian “New Testament”. So much so that I dare say I am probably more knowledgeable about them than most Christians.