By saying "God never came into existence", you are in effect, saying "God, does not exist." If I am reading this incorrectly, then what on Earth are you trying to say?
He never came into into existence because he never had to.
*thinks real hard.... Ok.... getting it....* (Admittedly the math was a bit over my head.)
nevermind-just forget about it- I wont even go into this, I hate typing, and you probably wouldn't even understand what im talking about.
So, from god directly to a physical realm, with no inbetween. Are you saying, that if we were able to poke a hole in the physical "plane", we would then see God grinning (or scowling) at us? You do realize that "Time" as it is commonly conceived, simply does not exist. Right? Feel free to ask any physicist.
No, you could never poke a hole in the physical plane, because we are physical, it exists we exist- never mind
PHYSICIST- you are bound by your conceptions built in this world
Ok ok ok... so god suddenly exists now.
(You started off by saying that "God never came into existence". Well, which is it? You can perhaps understand my feeble brain's confusion.) Wouldn't it make a tiny bit more sense for a supposed god to create a creation that reflected his nature, rather than setting up entirely new sets of rules, conflicting with that very nature? Why would he complicate things? To do otherwise would likely precipitate a rather poor design and that wouldn't be a particularly intelligent thing to do.
When will anything god does make sense to us?
you can sit there and explain yourslef to a beetle, but he wouldn't understand, it would most likely be a waste of time,
dont question Gods intelligence or his reasoning youll never get anywhere doing that, its impossible to grasp...
and hsi nature-
he is one supreme being- where nothing exists anywhere- why wouldn't he just create something like us?, why would he create something in his nature- which is divine?
are you suggesting that god should have duplicated himself?
You have got your concepts mixed up here. If god exists in the past, present and future, he would be eternal. Infinite is another thing altogether. You do understand the difference. Right?
Likewise, why do the so-called "laws of time" necessitate need? Sorry, that simply does not compute. You might want to rethink this whole notion.
eternal, in our mind, infinite nonetheless
the laws of time dictate the physical world
you dont completely understand it so why would I?
Do you have the slightest what you are talking about? Evidently, not. Knockout
In response to another member you said to use imagination. I would suggest that you are taking that advice to the extreme. Perhaps a little less imagination, and a lot more reason, is in order.
No, um you just dont understand do you?
the Reason of the world we know, although easier to comprehend isn't whats neede here
You are bound by your preconceptions......
Neither did the universe. Time supposedly began at the same instant as the universe. There was no "nothing one minute, something the next." There was a dense concentration of energy, and then it exploded. The rest is cosmic history. It's simple enough for my dismally inadequate mind, and I suppose it's close enough to what the cosmologists are saying.
Energy is a part of the physical world, what are you trying to say here?
That energy is somehow a removed element without the physical world?
just because we dont necesarily have the best understanding of energy doesn't give you an excuse to assume that energy is some magical essence that appered and magicaly blew the universe into existence...
call it dust, call it energy whatever you like,-your logic is flawed,the reasoning of our world states that what your trying to weave together is an impossibility
I dunno. It sounds like sandbox ontology to me. I honestly don't understand why you think the universe needs a governor at all. Politicians can't even get our mail to us on time, and you want to put one in charge of the universe? Tsk tsk. If you think of time as if it were a physical distance, the whole thing will make more sense to you.
but time itself is not in any way like a physical distance, you cant just assume to think this.....
I've been trying to figure this statement out, but it's just not clicking. Maybe I should google up some Latin and get more smarter.
I prefer faith in my own ability to think for myself on matters of my own destiny, though I'm not sure if this speaks to what you are saying.
maybe what you are not thinking enough about your destiny,
My guess is that she's saying that you have faith in yourself but that faith is undeserved, because you're a wretched sinful fallen human who doesn't know what's good for you. You may think you have the ability to discern truth for yourself but tha'ts because you are so blind that you can't see what you don't know. And if you don't admit this to yourself soon and rely on the mercy of Christ, you'll be really sorry when he comes again to separate the sheep from the goats and you get cast into the firey pits for the goat barbeque, extra spicy. Not my opinion mind you!! just trying to act as translator.
perhaps, your getting the idea.....
nah, the bible, belief in divine, christ himslef,
as illogical as christianity is for you,
remember what we know of god in this world is a vehicle to greater understanding the secrets of the universe, which we wont fully understand until we enter a different state of consciessness,
you can try but you wont get there all the way in this world...
so all we can do is absorb what our individual minds are capable of doing in this world.......
faith is simply a form of enlightenment
for ordinary folk.....
i suggest you get some ...
