A couple of problems we've already talked about... The Bible says Isaac was the son that was taken to be sacrificed. The New Testament says Jesus came back to life and appeared, ate, spoke and was touched by his disciples. Baha'is take both those plain and obvious stories and change them.
Why? Because they need Ishmael, not Isaac, to be the one Abraham took to be sacrificed.
Not a problem for me. Bahaullah answers:
The question is that whereas in past Scriptures
[1][2] Isaac is said to have been the sacrifice;
[3] in the Qur’án
[4] this station is given to Ishmael.
[5] This is, undoubtedly, true. All, however, must fix their gaze upon the word which hath dawned from the Divine Horizon:
[6]it is incumbent upon every soul to ponder upon its sovereignty, influence, might, and on its all-encompassing nature. There hath never been any doubt whatsoever that all these things are confirmed and corroborated only by the Word of God. It is the Word of God that transcendeth all things, creates the universe, educateth the people, guideth them who are sore athirst from separation unto the ocean of reunion, and penetrateth through the darkness of ignorance with the light of understanding. Consider: all those who believe in past Scriptures
[7] think of Isaac as the Sacrifice; likewise, the people of Qur’án
[8]confirm this station for Ishmael. It is clear and evident to every possessor of insight and every religious person that no one was, outwardly
[9] sacrificed; all agree that an animal was sacrificed. So, ponder upon this: Why is it that a person who hath gone to the altar of sacrifice for the Beloved and yet hath come back [alive], is adorned with the raiment of ‘Sacrifice of God’ and accepted
[10] as such? There is no doubt that this is so because of the Word of God. Therefore, the criterion
[11]for the manifestation of all names and for confirmation and fulfillment of all stations is dependent upon the Word of God.
[12]Likewise, there is no doubt, that the Inaccessible, Unknowable [God] doth not talk as He is, and hath always been, sanctified from such conditions; rather, He speaketh through the tongue of His Manifestations.
[13]Thus the Torah issued from the tongue of Moses. The same is true of other Holy Scriptures: all were revealed by the tongues of Prophets and Messengers but, the real Speaker
[14] in all these Holy Books is the One true God.... It is now, therefore, established and confirmed that the station of ‘Sacrifice of God’ was, according to past Books,
[15] given to Isaac by Abraham and that very same station is, according to Divine Revelation, Ishmael’s in the Qur’ánic Dispensation.
[16]
They also can't believe in the possibility that Jesus resurrected. So Baha'is change things in religions to suit their needs.
Baha'is can believe Jesus was resurrected spiritually. Now can Atheist believe Jesus was resurrected either spiritually or physically?