metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
I don't have a problem with the gist of the OP, but I do have to wonder why the flip-flopping charge was just aimed at Hillary? Not only did Romney become a rather notorious flip-flopper, so was Reagan. How many times did Reagan's press secretary have to give a press conference the next day after a Reagan speech or press conference trying to explain what Reagan "really meant". Does anyone remember the Iran-Contra scandal? How about taking conservative but spending like a drunken sailor, and then trying to blame it all on the Dems? [even if the Dems supposedly were to blame, there's something called a "veto"]
And how about the current field or Pubs? We've seen Bush get caught with his flip-flopping just in the last couple of weeks, for one example.
So, if it's one's own party that's flip-flopping, that seemingly is OK because it's just him/her "being political", but if it's the other party's candidate(s) that flip-flopping, they're "lying sacks of dung".
And how about the current field or Pubs? We've seen Bush get caught with his flip-flopping just in the last couple of weeks, for one example.
So, if it's one's own party that's flip-flopping, that seemingly is OK because it's just him/her "being political", but if it's the other party's candidate(s) that flip-flopping, they're "lying sacks of dung".