You assume all of reality can be reduced to definitions. You assume that everyone has the same definition for every word and that they can properly deconstruct your every utterance.
Everything you assume is probably wrong and definitively led to what you believe. We are a species who individually chooses our beliefs and then lives and breathes those beliefs. It's impossible to escape this because it's the very nature of our different kind of consciousness. We have 7 billion languages and 7 billion religions. You believe that "science", which is the world's fastest growing religion, is the only true religion when in reality it isn't even the only science but is rather one among many. As a science it's effective and serviceable but as a belief system it is the greatest threat to the survival of mankind.
The belief in "survival of the fittest" has already killed more human beings than every natural disaster in history combined.
You talk of assumptions being wrong...trying to tell others, especially those who disagree with you, being wrong with what they “assume”.
But i am wondering if you ever considered that your own assumptions being wrong?
Because I read your posts, I see the arrogance in your writing that you assume everyone who disagree with you being wrong.
For instances, you believe that science is a “religion”, but that is based on your assumption, which is wrong - it a false and misleading assumption.
Science is about knowledge gathering and it is only accepted after being tested, and the the only to test the explanatory and mathematical models, is through observation, eg evidence, experiments, data.
Depending on the evidence, there are 3 possible outcomes:
If sufficient numbers of evidence support the models, then they are likely true and accepted, because the evidence verified the models.
But if there are sufficient evidence that refute the models, then you could (A) either revise the models and tested the revised explanations/maths, (B) or you can completely discard those refuted models.
The worse things that can happen, if there are no evidence whatsoever. In this case, the models are rejected because they are “unfalsifiable”, “untestable” and “scientific”.
Because of requirements of testing explanatory model, in accordance with the Falsifiability, Scientific Method and Peer Review, a Scientific Theory is based on belief-based assumptions, hence science is not a religion.
The definition of religion, required faith-based belief, but more importantly, religion is also about reverence for belief in deity/deities or belief in spirit(s), and people performing rites, like praying.
Religion might also required other beliefs, such as belief in supernatural miracles, or belief in divine or spiritual powers, or the beliefs in afterlife (eg resurrection, transmigration of soul like reincarnation), which are all belief in supernatural.
In science, there are no belief in supernatural, deities, spirits, miracle. There are no praying to deities or to spirits. And there are no belief in miracles and afterlife.
So for you to equate science with religion, is simple false assumptions.
Another example, is another false assumption of yours about Evolution. The theory of Evolution, has nothing to do racism, nothing to do with killing people, not about murders or genocide, and not about wars.
The “survival of fittest”, has been misinterpreted by you, hence another false assumption by you, which is based on your ignorance.
Evolution is purely biology, as in what changes - PHYSICAL or GENETIC traits - being passed to future generations, that can aid with survival of species. If they don’t have the genes that allow them them to propagate and survive, they could face the possibility of extinction for that particular species.
The “extinction” isn’t about killing, which is apparently what you are thinking.
So basically, you have been making a lot of false assumptions, some come from your own ignorance, and some assumptions are just misleading...or worse, both.