I didn't say it was a hoax - I'm just saying I have no good reason to believe it's genuine.
The question is: WHY are you certain that it is official? Where is your information coming from?
Yes. Normally, when making a claim, it is useful to provide a source for the claim. Especially if, when searching for it yourself, you can't find any solid information.
Do you have any idea how many websites there are out there that make claims like "lizards control the world"? "9/11 was a hoax"? "Aliens kidnapped me and stole my dog"? How many of them do you believe are credible?
Of course not. But they provide very little, if any, evidence that they are true. We don't just accept something just because it hasn't been demonstrated to be false. We accept things when there is a good reason to accept them. This is why you (presumably) don't believe in the existence of fairies, smurfs and elves.
No, it's still a theory if it's a proposed explanation. The theory could be true, but it would still be a theoretical framework.
No, you're just accepting what these sites tell you as being true without actually looking into it.
And I would say you should be less gullible and put more effort into determining fact from fantasy.
Anyone can make a picture. Like this:
See that poster above? You made that and put it on your bedroom wall ten years ago.* Prove me wrong!
It means someone drew a picture of the tower of Babel and labelled it as Council of Europe poster and it may or may not have been used.
I can't find any source on the poster at all, so I can' really determine anything about it other than its existence.
Not really. Refusal of belief is not a conspiracy.
It's a potential explanation for the image, sure. I don't know if it's true any more than I know that it is a genuine poster, but I wouldn't put it past anyone. Have you never seen political cartoons? They draw on powerful symbolic imagery like this all the time. It's quite possible someone could have drawn the image as a political commentary and then, years down the line, somebody saw it and mistakenly believed it was a genuine EU poster, and the story spun out from there.
Like I said, I only had one source for that claim, and it didn't provide any references.
Whereas your belief that the EU would deliberately commission a poster featuring obvious negative connotations in an effort to
deliberately expose some sort of anti-Christian agenda makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
I'm a fan of reserving judgement, not jumping to conclusions like you.
*DISCLAIMER: Obviously I don't believe this, and nor am I seriously making this allegation - it is purely intended to illustrate a point. I'm sad that I have to put this disclaimer on here since it kind of defeats the purpose of the argument, but you can never be too careful these days.