Five million man: proofs of key problems

[mikkel_the_dane]

So many things to do, so little time to do it in.

Did i miss one?

Yes, I asked how you know that change is good?

 

[Altfish]

Yes, I asked how you know that change is good?

Did I say it was? What I meant was that a willingness to change is good. and by contrast dogma is bad

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Did I say it was? What I meant was that a willingness to change is good. and by contrast dogma is bad

Okay, how do you know that?

 

[questfortruth]

Okay, how do you know that?

The ability to change is the key feature of Darwinian Evolution. People began to hate Church Dormaes because they fell in love with Darwin.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

The ability to change is the key feature of Darwinian Evolution. People began to hate Church Dormaes because they fell in love with Darwin.

No, it is not. It is not the key feature, it is one of the features, but not the only one.

 

[questfortruth]

No, it is not. It is not the key feature, it is one of the features, but not the only one.

Word "Evolution" is from the verb "to evolve", to change over time.

 

[Altfish]

Okay, how do you know that?

Because if we didn't change we'd still be believing in The Sun God or Zeus

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Because if we didn't change we'd still be believing in The Sun God or Zeus

Yes, that is a fact. Now how is that good?

 

[Altfish]

Yes, that is a fact. Now how is that good?

Are you going to end this mad "How do you know that?" thread by saying, "There's a hole in my bucket, dear Lisa, a hole"

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Are you going to end this mad "How do you know that?" thread by saying, "There's a hole in my bucket, dear Lisa, a hole"

How do you know that it is mad?

If you don't know what I am doing, I am using a form of skepticism on you. Science and skepticism share doubt. So when you say something, I doubt that. You might have overlook something or I might have done so. But I can't tell just by you saying "Change is good", because you don't use evidence. You just say it. So I ask for evidence and thus knowledge; i.e. how do you know that?

 

[Altfish]

How do you know that it is mad?

If you don't know what I am doing, I am using a form of skepticism on you. Science and skepticism share doubt. So when you say something, I doubt that. You might have overlook something or I might have done so. But I can't tell just by you saying "Change is good", because you don't use evidence. You just say it. So I ask for evidence and thus knowledge; i.e. how do you know that?

Skeptics still take many things as true.

The world is round
Australia exists - despite never having been there.
2 + 2 = 4 (In base 10)
Evolution happens
etc.

It is a waste of time and effort to query such 'facts', concentrate on areas in dispute, where there are unknowns,

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Skeptics still take many things as true.

The world is round
Australia exists - despite never having been there.
2 + 2 = 4 (In base 10)
Evolution happens
etc.

It is a waste of time and effort to query such 'facts', concentrate on areas in dispute, where there are unknowns,

And how is change good? You still haven't answered other than making an unsupported claim.

 

[Altfish]

And how is change good? You still haven't answered other than making an unsupported claim.

Yes I have.I said some posts back...
We used to have dirty fossil fuel using steam engines; no we have clean electric high speed trains.

Another example...
We used to have polluted rivers, now they are much cleaner because we realise the harm done by tipping our rubbish and by-products in them.

 

[questfortruth]

Yes I have.I said some posts back...
We used to have dirty fossil fuel using steam engines; no we have clean electric high speed trains.

Another example...
We used to have polluted rivers, now they are much cleaner because we realise the harm done by tipping our rubbish and by-products in them.

The change is good if it is changing for the better. But if the thing is the best possible, then any change is the change for worse. For example, if your wife is like Mother Theresa, then do not look to find another wife.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Yes I have.I said some posts back...
We used to have dirty fossil fuel using steam engines; no we have clean electric high speed trains.

Another example...
We used to have polluted rivers, now they are much cleaner because we realise the harm done by tipping our rubbish and by-products in them.

Yes, you say, it is good for humans. I get that. How do you know, that it is good for humans?

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Yes I have.I said some posts back...
We used to have dirty fossil fuel using steam engines; no we have clean electric high speed trains.

Another example...
We used to have polluted rivers, now they are much cleaner because we realise the harm done by tipping our rubbish and by-products in them.

Take 2:
Can you connect what you are saying to this post?
Is Positive Psychology the Science of Religion?

 

[ecco]

Editor: "No. The result will be the same. My advice to you is basically to become first-grade student at some mathematical faculty."

First Grade?!? Wow! Your paper must be really bad for an editor to write something like that.

The fake mistake is a seeming mistake. For example, they told Jesus, that it is His mistake to believe in His Divine Father. So, they looked at the perfect Human and found a fake mistake. A fake mistake is what only seen, as a mistake, but it is not one.

As an example, you relate your problems to those Jesus had! Really? You do have a bit of ego going, don't you?

Rather than use Jesus, why not just show a "fake" mistake that the editor found in your paper. Then we can all decide.

Oh, wait. The reviewers never even bothered to point out specific mistakes, real or fake. Your entire papers were so bad they just got rejected out of hand. Since that is the case, why would you complain about "fake" mistakes?

 

[ecco]

No, this is the best answer of all. The remaining ones were not commenting, not advising me at all. Then it is evidence, that they did not read a single line.

You don't know what they did or did not read. Perhaps by not commenting, they were just being kind.

 

[questfortruth]

Perhaps by not commenting, they were just being kind.

Nobody knows. Their actions are consistent with the hypothesis, that they have not read a single line.

 

[ecco]

Nobody knows. Their actions are consistent with the hypothesis, that they have not read a single line.

Then why would one of them say you need remedial first-grade math?

Why not post a few chapters here so that we can give you feedback? The links didn't show any of what you wrote.