Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Go Trump Go!
Why do you think so, may I ask... Is it immoral in your opinion?Wow, what a sordid crime though. strangling a pregnant woman, then cutting out the baby to then kidnap it? That's some weird and creepy stuff.
On another note though, death penalty should be abolished.
Not that I'm aware of.@Vinayaka. Off topic. Was there an issue on Near Death Experiences thread?
Just curious cause I was about to comment but it said error.
Either or both.Are we talking about this because we're taking a human life or because she's a woman?
If the latter, I don't see how gender is relevant to serving a sentence.
I do not know what this has to do with Trump, but I am not against the death sentence.Go Trump Go!
Did I say that?
What about the barbaric murders they committed?So what is the complaint, the barbaric death penalty or the blatant sex discrimination?
Why?On another note though, death penalty should be abolished.
What about the many people on death row who were later exonerated? Death's pretty final, can't be undone if exculpatory evidence later comes to light.What about the barbaric murders they committed?
What about the many people on death row who were later exonerated? Death's pretty final, can't be undone if exculpatory evidence later comes to light.
Another question. What makes it wrong for one man to kill another, but right for other men to then kill him? Isn't it the same offense?
Why do you think so, may I ask... Is it immoral in your opinion?
Dunno where that info came from.
I do not think anyone should ever get the death sentence unless the evidence clearly proves they are guilty and there is no doubt. When someone confesses to the murder we know they are guilty but they often do that to avoid the death sentence.What about the many people on death row who were later exonerated? Death's pretty final, can't be undone if exculpatory evidence later comes to light.
It is not the same at all. One was a planned out murder for selfish purposes and the other was a carrying out justice.Another question. What makes it wrong for one man to kill another, but right for other men to then kill him? Isn't it the same offense?
Is it more costly than taking care of a prisoner for life?Since you and @Trailblazer want to know, I'm opposed to it not because it could be conceived as immoral but because it's costly, inefficient, completely useless as a deterant, impossible to reverse in case of error and unecessary since life in prison without parole guaranty the safety of society just as well if not more since it offers a way out for people wrongfully condamned.
Is it more costly than taking care of a prisoner for life?
Why do you think it is useless as a deterrent?