Those were my beliefs, not claims.
I could prove the first two but not the last, but since they were not claims I have no burden.
First you claimed that humans changed the original messages.
Correct! And in many many cases it was simply because of erroneous interpretations, one case of many is 1 Chronicles 2: 16 where it is said that David had two sisters Zeruiah and Abigail, [The Hebrew used here is 'achoth' which is correctly translated as 'sister in most bibles, but the authors of the Good News Bible catholic study edition, have erroneously interpreted this as the daughters of Jesse, but they are not, they are David's sisters because the mother of David already had two daughters and a son who were sired by King Nahash, before he gave her to Jesse, who had lost his first wife.
Second you said that they often corrupted those messages.
Again you were correct. And some of the corruptions were deliberate in order to change the original meaning.
In todays biblical canon which was established in the 4th century by the authorities of the Roman church of Emperor Constantine, Luke 3: 22; reads: "You are my own dear son, I am pleased with you. Making it seem as though Jesus was the son of God and later born of flesh.
Whereas the following authorities of the second, third, and fourth centuries read, “This day I have begotten thee,” vouched for by Codex D, and the most ancient copies of the old latin (a, b. c. ff.I), by Justin Martyr (AD 140), Clemens Alex, (AD. 190), Methodius (AD. 290), among the Greeks. And among the Latins, Lactaitius (AD 300), Hilary (AD) Juvencus (AD. 330), Faustus (AD. 400) and Augustine. All these oldest manuscripts were changed completely. They now read, “This is my son in whom I am well pleased.” Whereas the original variant was, “Thou art my Son. This day I have begotten thee,” or "TODAY I have become your Father, revealing that Jesus was a man who was born as a son of God, not by blood nor by the will of the flesh, nor of the will of Man, but of the spirit which descended upon him in the form of a dove as he came up out of the baptismal waters of the Jordan and the heavenly voice was heard to say, "YOU ARE MY SON, TODAY I HAVE BEGOTTEN THEE."
The Roman church also added its own interpolations to make it seem that Jesus was not born of a human father, such as in Luke 3:23; (KJV) where it is saidL "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (
as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,. The (
AS WAS SUPPOSED) in brackets, was a later interpolation by those who believed the false teaching of the so-called virgin birth.
In the different translations of the KJV into Arabic, Afrikaan, Zulu, etc and even some of the more modern English translations, such as the Good News Bible, the words (
As was supposed) have been retained, but the brackets are removed, thus by, making those words appear to be the declaration of Luke, while the serious biblical students know that they were not written by Luke, but were a later interpolation and a corruption of the Holy Scriptures, by those Christians, who refuse to accept that Jesus was not a God who became a man, but a man, born of human parents, who was later CHOSEN by the Lord our saviour ‘The Son of Man,’ as his heir and successor.
Then in John 20: 17; It is written; " Jesus said, "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet
ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am
ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'"
The Greek, "anabaino,'" is here correctly translated as "ASCEND" as in nearly all biblical translations, except for the Romans Good News Bible, who want you to believe that Jesus had previously came down from heaven and here it is said, "Jesus said, "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet
gone back up to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am
RETURNING to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'"
Now there are many Greek words that can be translated to mean "RETURN," but "anabaino" is not one of them.
Third you claimed that those messages came from God. And again you are correct, but atheists, who have never received a visitation from '
THE SON OF MAN' who, according to our concept of one directional time, is still currently developing within the body of mankind, Just as mankind had developed within the bodies of our animal ancestors, simply because they refuse to accept him.
Come travel with me on a journey through time
Not in some capsule, but in our minds
To the Inner Most Sanctuary will we descend
To that single cell from which your body began
In the Holy of Holies where all is one
Where all of space and time is joined
We’ll mingle there with other minds
From other lands, in other times
Minds of the past, who seem dead and gone
And minds of the future who are yet unborn
For they in their time, whether here on this world
Or some distant planet to which they’ve been lured
Will enter their inner most sanctuary too
And there perhaps they’ll merge with you
Ah! To travel through space In the wink of an eye
One with your child on some world way on high
And if this is but madness, then madness it be
But come my mad brothers, come follow me.....The Anointed