The topic is talking about Creationism vs. Evolution.
Yes. And in that "debate",
evolution is the biological theory. Not the colloguial use of the word, but the scientific theory.
Creationism believes the earth was magically created, instead of formed out the dust of exploded stars.
In the creationism vs evolution "debate", it is specifically about the origins of species. Homo Sapiens in particular.
Yes I am. The same process that created the earth, created biological life.
No.
The topic is neither the origin of planets nor the origins of life.
It is the origin of species.
Are you simply going to keep on denying this?
If you are, please say so... then I can just ignore this intellectually dishonest charade.
Creationism is about all of it, not just Adam and Eve.
In the topic of creationism
vs evolution, it is not.
The earth is 6000 years old, and not 4.5 billion years, you know that argument of Creationists, don't you?
It's not??
The Evolution of the Universe
Our understanding of the genesis and evolution of the universe is one of the great achievements of 20th-century science. This knowledge comes from decades of innovative experiments and theories. Modern telescopes on the ground and in space detect the light from galaxies billions of light-years away, showing us what the universe looked like when it was young. Particle accelerators probe the basic physics of the high-energy environment of the early universe. Satellites detect the cosmic background radiation left over from the early stages of expansion, providing an image of the universe on the largest scales we can observe.
That's the title of an article.
Not the name of a scientific theory.
Again, we are not talking about colloquial use of the word "evolution".
The "debate" of creationism
vs evolution, is specifically about the origins of species.
Not about the "evolution" of soccer or tennis.
"Not even a thing", you say?
Do you not understand what evolution actually is?
In the context of this OP - yes.
It's you who seems confused.
No it's not. The OP says Evolution vs. Creationism. That means everything, not just biology.
It does not.
Simple Google search yields some easy info:
Cosmic Evolution
Cosmic evolution is the study of many varied changes on a universal scale, a subject that seeks to synthesize the reductionistic posture of specialized science with a holistic view of systems science. It is a story about the awe and majesty of twirling galaxies and shining stars, of redwood trees and buzzing bees, of a Universe that has come to know itself. But it is also a story about our human selves--our origin, our existence, and perhaps our destiny.
Again, that's a topic. Not a theory.
Evolution theory is a theory that deals with the origins of species.
Cosmological theories are theories like big bang theory etc.
You seem to have great difficulty grasping the difference between colloquial use of english words vs scientific terms.
Correct. You have no idea what I'm talking about, because you have no idea what you are talking about. Hopefully now with this new knowledge you were unaware of for you, if you reread my posts you might understand them and offer a more appropriate response.
No need.
I can only repeat myself.
The creationism
vs evolution thingy, is specifically about
biological evolution theory.
Creationism is about God creating everything, including the cosmos, versus evolution creating them, or "natural processes", which is precisely what evolution is.
Evolution, in that context, is a SINGLE natural process. That process dealing with how
species change over time.
That is what this topic is in fact about.
It is not.