mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
That it works in his/her case. There is no objective standard for evidence. All standards are subjective including science.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Does a god exist
- Thread starter We Never Know
- Start date
That it works in his/her case. There is no objective standard for evidence. All standards are subjective including science.
syo
Well-Known Member
Who created you? A god can only start Maya.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
syo
Well-Known Member
You are joking, right?
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
syo
Well-Known Member
You say you are sure. I don't care what you feel, actually. Think whatever you wish.
syo
Well-Known Member
God created Maya. Gods only can create Maya.
syo
Well-Known Member
Meaningless remarks.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
syo
Well-Known Member
You don't know what i considered or not.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
As far as I can tell there are overall 3 versions of positives and negatives. Objective, social and individual. Some people do those differently than me.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
The main point is: how would one even know whether existence ever had any need - or even a place - for some sort of creator?
How would we even know?
And is it even logically consistent to propose a "creator of existence"?
I have no idea. And I have long realized that it is the ultimate useless question. I have no more ability nor need to know such things than I have expectations of truly understanding, say, the true motivations of Robespierre at the start of the French Revolution. In fact, I have a lot less. For all practical purposes, none at all.
Even taking for granted that somehow there is such an entity as an uncreated creator of existence, that only feels meaningful at first glance. It really has no consequence whatsoever, and arguably could not ever have any.
Add Abrahamic expectations that somehow that hypothetical entity is both real and attentive to human behavior and omnipresent, omniscient and all-powerful to boot and it all becomes sort of unsustainable even under the most charitable of perspectives.
So no, I do not know that there is a need for deities in any way, shape or form. And if that means that I don't know anything about the origin of existence itself... that is fair and proper. I never expected to.
How would we even know?
And is it even logically consistent to propose a "creator of existence"?
I have no idea. And I have long realized that it is the ultimate useless question. I have no more ability nor need to know such things than I have expectations of truly understanding, say, the true motivations of Robespierre at the start of the French Revolution. In fact, I have a lot less. For all practical purposes, none at all.
Even taking for granted that somehow there is such an entity as an uncreated creator of existence, that only feels meaningful at first glance. It really has no consequence whatsoever, and arguably could not ever have any.
Add Abrahamic expectations that somehow that hypothetical entity is both real and attentive to human behavior and omnipresent, omniscient and all-powerful to boot and it all becomes sort of unsustainable even under the most charitable of perspectives.
So no, I do not know that there is a need for deities in any way, shape or form. And if that means that I don't know anything about the origin of existence itself... that is fair and proper. I never expected to.
Last edited:
syo
Well-Known Member
Then stick to your faith. Why bother talking?